民族史及其超越——兼论复线的民族史的可行性  

National History and Its Transcendence:On the Feasibility of a Bifurcated National History

作　　者：张旭鹏[1] Zhang Xupeng(Institute of Historical Theories,Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing,100101,China)

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院历史理论研究所,北京100101

出　　处：《古代文明（中英文）》2023年第3期3-15,M0003,共14页The Journal of Ancient Civilizations

摘　　要：民族史在中国的兴起,发端于近代中国史家构建民族国家的诉求,在塑造民族认同、凝聚民族意识、促进国家统一中起到了重要作用。但民族史也因其同质化和排他性的民族国家叙事,忽视了其内部不同族群的历史。近年来,在全球史的影响下,一些历史学家尝试从周边和内亚的视角重新理解中国,力求打破民族国家叙事的僵化思维,撰写更具开放性的民族史,进而展现民族国家内部的复杂性和多样性。就这一点而言,边疆这一兼具内外两种因素,同时又容纳了权力的中心与边陲的流动区域,为撰写这种开放的民族史提供了一种有益的视角和可行的路径。The rise of national history in China,which began with the pursuit of the Chinese historians to create a nation-state in China,played an important role in shaping national identity,enhancing national consciousness and promoting national unity.However,because of its homogeneous and exclusive narrative of the nation-state,national history has neglected the histories of different ethnic groups within it.Under the influence of global history,in recent years,some historians attempted to re-conceptualize China from the perspectives of the neighboring areas and Inner Asia,seeking to break the rigid nationalist conception of history and write Chinese history presenting unity as well as diversity.As far as this is concerned,the frontier that involves more social mobility,internal and external factors,and the intertwined powers of the center and peripheries constitutes asubstantial subject in writing bifurcated national history.

关 键 词：民族史 民族国家 边疆 复线的历史 

分 类 号：K28[历史地理—历史学]