清代河南京控吏役案件探析  

Study on the Cases of Capital Appeals in Henan Province in the Qing Dynasty

作　　者：吕宽庆[1] LV Kuanqing(Zhengzhou University of Aeronautics,Zhengzhou 450046,China)

机构地区：[1]郑州航空工业管理学院,河南郑州450046

出　　处：《郑州航空工业管理学院学报（社会科学版）》2023年第3期58-64,共7页Journal of Zhengzhou University of Aeronautics(Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：清代河南京控案件中有不少涉及地方书吏和衙役的,皇帝严令河南巡抚查明事实真相,依法断拟。河南官员审理时发现,这些告状都有许多不实之词。为了自身利益,河南地方官员遵照程序、运用司法技术将不少案件审断为诬告。这样做的根本原因,在于地方官员与中央和皇帝的博弈,二者在京控类案件上,司法诉求存在本质差异,河南省级官员在乎的是自身政治利益,而清廷最高统治者关注的是法律公正。二者最终博弈的结果是妥协:河南省级官员保障了自身利益,清廷最高统治者得到司法诉讼的解决。In the Qing Dynasty,there were many cases of capital appeals involving local scribes and government officials.The emperor ordered the governor of Henan province to find out the truth and make a fair decision according to law.Henan officials found many false statements in these cases during the trial.For their own interests,these officials have judged many cases as false accusations by procedures and using judicial techniques.The fundamental reason for this is the game between local officials and the central government and the emperor.There are essential differences in the judicial appeals of the officials and the emperor in the case of capital appeals.Provincial officials in Henan only cared about their own political interests,while the emperor of the Qing Dynasty cared about legal justice.The final result of the game is to compromise:provincial officials in Henan guaranteed their own interests,and what the emperor got was settlement of judicial litigation.

关 键 词：清代 京控 地方司法 博弈 

分 类 号：D929[政治法律—法学]