社区矫正社会工作实践路径问题研究——以C市为例  

Research on the Practice Path of Community Correction Social Work:Tak⁃ing City C as an Example

作　　者：易庐金 全亮[1,2] YI Lujin;QUAN Liang(School of Law,Sichuan Normal University,Chengdu,Sichuan 610068,China;Centre for Juvenile Justice Research and Services,Sichuan Normal University,Chengdu,Sichuan 610068,China)

机构地区：[1]四川师范大学法学院,四川成都610068 [2]四川师范大学少年司法研究与服务中心,四川成都610068

出　　处：《宜宾学院学报》2023年第7期17-23,62,共8页Journal of Yibin University

基　　金：四川省高等学校人文社会科学重点研究基地社区矫正研究中心2020年度一般课题项目“司法社会工作介入社区矫正问题研究”(SQJZ2020-03);2020年成都市社会组织发展专项基金研究课题项目“成都市社区矫正社会工作服务实证研究”(成慈协〔2020〕433号1-2-162)。

摘　　要：从C市社区矫正社会工作全程介入式与部分介入式实践路径下的服务现状来看,两种实践路径均取得了相应的矫正效果,但存在人员不足、专业性不强、经费不够和资源整合度不够等问题。问题的根源在于社区矫正社会工作面临的内外部冲突、刑事执行管理与社会服务界限不清、社区矫正社会工作者综合素养不高以及三个系统层面服务体系化不足等因素。对此,两种实践路径下的社工服务都应更注重理论与实务的联结,并优化服务机制和服务策略,不断推进社区矫正社会工作专业化发展。From the perspective of the service status under the whole-course and partial interventional practice paths of community correction social work in C City,both practice paths have achieved corresponding correction effects,but there are problems such as insufficient personnel,low professionalism,insufficient funds and insufficient resource integration.The above problems are actually rooted in the internal and external conflicts faced by social work in community correction,the unclear boundary between criminal enforcement management and social services,the low comprehensive quality of social workers in community correction,and the insufficient systematic construction of services at the three system levels.Therefore,the social work services under the two practice paths should pay more attention to the connection between theory and practice,and optimize the service mechanism and service strategy,so as to continuously promote the professional development of community correction social work.

关 键 词：社区矫正 社会工作 实践路径 

分 类 号：D926.13[政治法律—法学]