检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨豪 Yang Hao(Magister Juris School of Education,Northwest University of Politics and Law,Yuanyuan Yuanyuan,Xi'an)
机构地区:[1]西北政法大学法律硕士教育学院,西安710063
出 处:《北方经贸》2023年第6期100-103,共4页Northern Economy and Trade
摘 要:信息碎片化时代,我国短视频法律定位缺失,相关规范存在滞后性。短视频运营模式各异,“内容型”短视频平台不能简单以居间人身份定位,其经营主导地位打破传统“技术中立”原则限制,意味着不能在相关侵权案件司法实践中简单适用“避风港原则”和“红旗标准”规则。正确把握侵权认定原则并健全举证责任倒置规则,有益于民法典时代下进一步落实保护版权主旨,平衡短视频版权侵权责任认定,避免苛责,以促进自媒体数字经济发展和文化创新。In the era of information fragmentation,the legal orientation of“short video”is missing,and the relevant norms are lagging behind.Given that short video operation models vary,a content-based short video platform cannot be positioned simply as a broker,and its dominant position in operation has broken the limitations of the traditional“technology neutrality”principle,which means that the“safe harbor principle”and the"red flag standard"cannot be applied simply in the judicial practices of relevant infringement cases.Correctly understanding infringement status and perfecting the allocation of burden of proof for presumption of fault is conducive to further implementing the main purpose of copyright protection in the era of civil code,balancing the determination of liability for short video copyright infringement,avoiding severe liability,and promoting cultural innovation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200