拒绝严格责任?——反省康德主义侵权法理论  

Rejecting Strict Liability?A Reflection on Kantian Theory of Tort Law

作　　者：王昱博 Wang Yubo

机构地区：[1]伦敦大学学院

出　　处：《交大法学》2023年第4期42-62,共21页SJTU Law Review

摘　　要：温里布和里普斯坦主张一种有影响力的康德主义的侵权法说明性理论,拒斥严格责任。此种对侵权法的说明基于矫正正义观念以及康德法权的独立性观念。虽然矫正正义观念可靠,但独立性观念却存在瑕疵。对严格责任的拒绝,也由于其对“侵权法中的普通人是独立的人”这一预设的依赖,不符合司法实践和日常直觉,因此失败。侵权法的说明理论,应当依赖更好的对侵权法中的“人”的说明。An influential Kantian explanatory theory of tort law rejects strict liability.This theory is based on the notion of corrective justice and a particular notion of independence in Kantian Right.The notion of corrective justice is reliable,while the notion of independence is normatively flawed.The rejection of strict liability also fails because the argument relies on the presumption that ordinary persons in tort law are independent,and the presumption does not fit legal practice and ordinary intuitions.A better explanatory theory of tort law should seek to provide a better conception of persons governed by tort law.

关 键 词：温里布 里普斯坦 矫正正义 独立 严格责任 

分 类 号：D909.1[政治法律—法学理论] D913[政治法律—法学]