禁诉令在我国的司法应对策略探析  

On Judicial Strategies in Response to Injunction

作　　者：吴朝纲 袁雪丽 WU Chao-gang;YUAN Xue-li(Law School,Sichuan University,Chengdu 610065,China;Beijing Dongwei(Chengdu)Law Firm,Chengdu 610065,China)

机构地区：[1]四川大学法学院,成都610065 [2]北京东卫(成都)律师事务所,成都610065

出　　处：《湖北第二师范学院学报》2023年第6期59-63,共5页Journal of Hubei University of Education

摘　　要：在最高人民法院公布的2020年知识产权十大案例中两度出现禁诉令的身影,且两例案件中禁诉令都为纠纷化解起到了重要作用。禁诉令制度脱胎于英国国内法,本为衡平法院与普通法院争夺案件管辖权的工具。从国内法领域进入国际法领域之后,禁诉令体现出了强烈的单边主义特性与司法侵犯性。禁诉令制度与我国一贯的法律文化并不契合,我国统一的司法体制下也不存在对禁诉令之类争夺管辖权工具的需求,因而我国司法系统对禁诉令是陌生又排斥的。对禁诉令不应当采取消极应对策略,而应当基于现有制度以及先例积极应对。Among the top ten intellectual property cases in the Supreme Court in 2020,there are two cases of injunctions,both play an important role in resolving disputes.The injunction system originate from the British domestic law and was originally a tool for the equity court and the ordinary court to compete for the jurisdiction of cases.After entering the field of international law,the injunction has shown a strong feature of unilateralism and judicial aggression.The injunction system is not consistent with China’s legal culture,and there is no need for the injunction and other tools to compete for jurisdiction under the unified judicial system in China.There injunction is unfamiliar and incompatible in the judicial system in China.China should not respond negatively to injunction,but should be react actively to it based on existing systems and precedents.

关 键 词：禁诉令 英国法 法律文化 司法策略 知识产权 

分 类 号：D9234[政治法律—民商法学]