何景明“靡、弱、振、亡”说与复古派的“变古”性  

He Jingming's Theory of"Mi,Ruo,ZHen,Wang"and the Retro School's Nature of"Changing the Ancients"

作　　者：周潇 徐沛沛 ZHOU Xiao;XU Peipei(School of Literature and communication,Qingdao University,Qingdao 266071,China)

机构地区：[1]青岛大学文学与新闻传播学院,山东青岛266071

出　　处：《赣南师范大学学报》2023年第4期57-61,共5页Journal of Gannan Normal University

基　　金：国家社科基金项目(21BZW198)。

摘　　要：明代“前后七子”为代表的复古派并非守旧派,他们发起的文学复古运动在回顾诗文传统的同时有着深刻的“变古”内涵。何景明在《与李空同论诗书》中提到的“靡”“弱”“振”“亡”是认识复古派“变古”主张的突破点,一是强调了诗文发展呈现动态演进和反复性的客观事实;二是指出文学复古必然伴随革新;三是揭示了复古的目的实为“变古”。复古派其他成员的论断虽有差异性,但对复古与变古这一问题的认识无疑殊途同归。李攀龙则融合了李、何二人的观点,将“拟议成变”作为复古的纲领,实现了复古派理论的成熟。The retro school represented by"the First and Last Seven Sons"in the Ming Dynasty is not the old school.The literary retro movement initiated by them has a profound connotation of"changing the ancient"while reviewing the tradition of poetry and prose.He Jingming mentioned in his Book of Poems with Li Kongtong that"Mi","Ruo","ZHen"and"Wang"are the breakthrough point to understand the"change the ancient"propositions of the retro school.First,it emphasizes the objective fact that the development of poetry and prose presents dynamic evolution and repetition.The second is to point out that the literary retro must be accompanied by innovation.Third,it reveals that the purpose of retro is"to be ancient".Although the conclusions of other members of the retro school are different,their understanding of the problem of retro and retro-ancient undoubtedly leads to the same destination.Li Panlong integrated the views of Li and He,took"proposed transformation"as the program of retro,and realized the maturity of retro theory.

关 键 词：何景明 《与李空同论诗书》 明代复古运动 变古 

分 类 号：I206.4[文学—中国文学]