我国不同收入地区农村居民攀比效应研究  

Research on the Comparison Effect of Rural Residents in Different Income Areas in China

作　　者：吴学品[1] 马永俊 WU Xue-pin;MA Yong-jun(School of Economics,Hainan University,Haikou 570228,China)

机构地区：[1]海南大学经济学院,海南海口570228

出　　处：《数学的实践与认识》2023年第6期27-37,共11页Mathematics in Practice and Theory

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目“基于习惯形成嵌入面板ELES模型视角的城乡居民消费结构研究”(19BJL047)

摘　　要：将外部习惯形成理论融入面板ELES模型,拓展了原模型的理论内涵,重新界定了"基本需求"的内容,并采用省域数据实证分析我国不同收入地区农村居民在各类消费支出中攀比效应的存在性和差异情况.研究结果表明:我国不同收入地区农村居民在各类消费支出中均存在显著的攀比效应,发展享受型消费(家设服务、医疗保健和交通通讯)在不同收入地区的攀比效应都比较大.具体而言,高、低收入地区在食品和衣着的攀比效应比中等收入地区大;高收入地区在家设服务、交通通讯和医疗保健的攀比效应最大,中收入地区次之、低收入地区最小;不同收入地区在文教娱乐消费的攀比效应差异较小;中收入地区在居住类消费的攀比效应要强于高、低收入地区.This paper integrates the theory of external habit formation into the panel ELES model,extending the theoretical content of the original model and redefining the content of"basic needs".It also uses local data to empirically analyze the existence and differences of the comparison effect in various types of consumption expenditure among rural residents in different income regions in China.The study results show a significant climbing effect in all types of consumption expenditure among rural residents in different income regions in China.The comparison effect of development and enjoyment consumption(household services,health care,and transportation and communication)is relatively large in different income areas.Specifically,the comparison effect in food and clothing is more significant in high and low-income areas than in middle-income areas.The comparison effect for household services,transport and communications,and health care is most remarkable in high-income areas,followed by middle-income areas,and most diminutive in low-income areas.There is less variation between income regions in the climbing effect for education,culture,and entertainment consumption.The comparison effect is more robust for housing consumption in the middle-income regions than in the high-and low-income regions.

关 键 词：攀比效应 ELES模型 农村居民消费 

分 类 号：F323.8[经济管理—产业经济]