商纣罪恶附会钩沉  

On Strained Interpretations of Shang Zhou’s Sin

作　　者：解洪兴 解洪旺 XIE Hong-xing;XIE Hong-wang(Harbin Normal University,Harbin 150025,China;Qitaihe Municipal Party School of C.P.C.,Qitaihe 154600,China)

机构地区：[1]哈尔滨师范大学历史文化学院,黑龙江哈尔滨150025 [2]中共七台河市委党校哲学教研室,黑龙江七台河154600

出　　处：《哈尔滨学院学报》2023年第6期88-91,共4页Journal of Harbin University

基　　金：2020年度国家社科基金重大招标项目:古典学与中国早期文学的历史格局研究,项目编号:20&ZD263;哈尔滨师范大学博士启动基金项目:先秦社会民间信仰生活状态的多维度研究。

摘　　要：对于商纣王的暴君形象,应该本着实事求是的态度,结合当时的实际情形重新理性辨析,从而才能接近历史的本象。关于商纣王恶声恶行的记载应该是层累叠加的结果,最早出于周人的宣传,更多的是基于不同族群、不同时空催生的偏差所致。商纣王应该是一个予智予雄的暴君,只是其亡国殒身的悲剧命运负载了敌人与后人太多的附会,而其本身之恶政应该没有传统观点那样极端。For the image of the tyrant of King Zhou of Shang,we should adopt a pragmatic attitude and re-analyze it rationally based on the actual situation at that time,in order to approach the essence of history.The records of the evil voices and deeds of King Zhou of the Shang Dynasty should be the result of a series of layers,originating from the propaganda of the Zhou people and more based on biases generated by different ethnic groups and different time and space.King Zhou of the Shang Dynasty should be a tyrant who bestowed great wisdom and power,but his tragic fate of his death carried too much support from the enemy and future generations,and his own evil policies should not be as extreme as traditional views.

关 键 词：商纣王 暴君 附会 偏差 

分 类 号：K221.07[历史地理—历史学]