明人对韩宋政权的历史书写  

Historical Writings on the Han-Song Regime during the Ming Dynasty

作　　者：周中梁 Zhou Zhongliang

机构地区：[1]长江大学人文与新媒体学院,434000

出　　处：《史学理论研究》2023年第3期77-89,159,共14页Historiography Bimonthly

摘　　要：明朝初年隐讳朱元璋曾向韩宋政权称臣之事,努力压抑相关社会记忆,并在官修史籍中贬抑韩宋的地位。成化朝《续资治通鉴纲目》为贬低元朝正统地位,提高了书写韩宋政权的规格。随着龙凤文献的复出,中晚明私家史学开始关注韩宋政权,对朱元璋是否奉龙凤正朔、受韩宋官爵的观点不一。当时史家开始对韩宋进行再评价,多肯定韩宋对抗元廷的功绩,但以称赞朱元璋忠心、否定韩林儿君主身份等办法维护朱元璋的形象。钱谦益则将韩宋奉为元明之际的正统,否认明廷曾忌言韩宋。韩宋的历史地位受到官方操纵、皇权松弛、蒙汉关系等因素的影响,体现了中国古代正统观的复杂性。由此,农民战争与历史书写的关系,可作为农民战争史研究的新视角。The early Ming government concealed Zhu Yuanzhang's claim of vassalage to the Han-Song regime and attempted to suppress the social memory of this event.They also depreciated the status of the Han-Song in official historical records.The official record in Xu Zizhi Tongjian Gangmu during the Chenghua period treated the Han-Song regime with higher status for the purpose to downgrade the orthodox status of the Yuan dynasty.By the mid-and-late Ming period,private historiography began to focus on the Han-Song regime due to the resurgence of Longfeng documents.Historians differed in their views on whether Zhu Yuanzhang once adopted the Longfeng era name and received official titles designated by the Han-Song regime.Most mid-and-late Ming historians acknowledged the Han-Song's achievements against the Yuan court but defended Zhu Yuanzhang's reputation by praising his loyalty and denying Han Lin'er's status as a monarch.The historical status of the Han-Song regime was influenced by factors such as official manipulation of memory,loosening of imperial control,and tensions in Mongolian-Han Chinese relations,which reflected the complexity of ancient Chinese orthodox views.

关 键 词：朱元璋 韩宋政权 历史书写 农民战争 

分 类 号：K092[历史地理—历史学]