国外媒体“一带一路”新闻报道中的态度评价——以《海峡时报》《雅加达邮报》和《新海峡时报》为例  

Attitude in Overseas Media Coverage of the Belt and Road Initiative

作　　者：何意 罗普光 HE Yi;LUO Puguang(School of Foreign Languages,Zhengzhou University of Aeronautics,Zhengzhou 450046,China;School of Foreign Languages,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China)

机构地区：[1]郑州航空工业管理学院外国语学院,河南郑州450046 [2]中国人民大学外国语学院,北京100872

出　　处：《管理工程师》2023年第3期43-50,共8页Management Engineer

基　　金：河南省研究生联合培养基地项目(YJS2022JD44);郑州航院研究生联合培养基地项目(2023YJSJD4)。

摘　　要：“一带一路”倡议在国内得到了广泛认可和支持,但在国外却存在着各种不同的看法和态度评价。研究外国官方媒体对“一带一路”的态度,有助于海外宣传和外交工作,增加“一带一路”的影响力和传播力,提高国际社会对“一带一路”的认可和支持度。文章以评价理论为基础,分析了新加坡《海峡时报》、印度尼西亚《雅加达邮报》和马来西亚《新海峡时报》三家官方媒体在“一带一路”报道中的态度评价分布差异,并为“一带一路”的国际传播提出建议,以期为其国际传播策略的制定提供参考。While the Belt and Road Initiative(BRI)has gained widespread recognition and support domestically,it has been met with varying views and attitudes abroad.Analyzing the attitudes of foreign official media towards the BRI can aid in overseas promotion and diplomatic work,increase the influence and dissemination of the BRI,and improve international recognition and support.Based on the appraisal theory,this study analyzes the differences in attitude distribution in the coverage of the BRI by three official media outlets:The Straits Times in Singapore,Jakar⁃ta Post in Indonesia,and New Straits Times in Malaysia.The study also provides suggestions for the international communication strategy of the BRI,in hopes of providing a reference for its international communication strategy de⁃velopment.

关 键 词：“一带一路” 新闻报道 评价理论 国际传播 

分 类 号：F125[经济管理—世界经济]