我国风俗犯罪实行行为的规范重构——基于法益侵害说的展开  

On the Normative Reconstruction of the Perpetrating Act of Moral Crime in China——Based on the Theory of Infringement of Legal Interests

作　　者：胡波 HU Bo(Law School,Qufu Normal University,Rizhao 276826,China)

机构地区：[1]曲阜师范大学法学院,山东日照276826

出　　处：《东北师大学报（哲学社会科学版）》2023年第4期156-164,共9页Journal of Northeast Normal University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)

基　　金：中国法学会部级法学研究一般课题(CLS(2019)C07)。

摘　　要：根据法益侵害说的立场,入罪化的准则是行为具有法益侵害性。不过,并非所有的法益侵害行为和具有法益侵害危险的行为都应被予以入罪化,还需要借由从属性原则和伤害原则对其进行限定。以风俗犯罪正当化的基础要件作为考察依据,得以推知我国风俗犯罪实行行为的设定不尽合理,表现为相关实行行为的规定失之于笼统、粗疏,缺乏法律规范应有的明确性与周密性,致使不具有法益侵害性的行为被纳入刑法规制范围,与法益保护原则相悖。缘于此,有必要在犯罪论层面对我国风俗犯罪的创制进行检讨,以便能够适时厘正设定失当的实行行为,并将相关的风俗犯罪予以出罪化,进而规范风俗犯罪的处罚根据。The criterion of criminalization,according to the theory of infringement of legal interests,is that the acts show infringement of legal interests.However,not all such acts and those with such risk should be criminalized.They need to be defined by the accessory principle and harm principle.Based on the basic elements of the justification of moral crime,it can be inferred that the establishment of perpetrating acts of this kind in China is not reasonable,manifested in its general and slack provisions.The lack of clarity and thoroughness that legal norms should have results in the inclusion of non-invasive acts into the regulation of criminal law,contrary to the protection principle of legal interests.Therefore,it is necessary to review China s establishment of moral crime from the perspective of crime theory to correct perpetrating acts that are set unreasonably in time and decriminalize relevant moral crime,in an attempt to regulate its punishment basis.

关 键 词：风俗犯罪实行行为 法益侵害性 法益保护原则 刑法规制 出罪化 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]