引发争议的后人类性  

The Contentious Posthumanities

作　　者：罗西·布拉伊多蒂 宋根成[2] 祁鑫欣(译) 韦施伊(校) Rosi Braidotti;SONG Gencheng;QI Xinxin;WEI Shiyi(Faculty of Humanities,Utrecht University,Utrecht 3508,The Netherlands;School of International Studies,Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou,Henan 450001,China;Foreign Language School of Zhengzhou Economic and Technological Development Zone,Zhengzhou,Henan 450000,China;School of Humanities,Guangzhou University,Guangzhou,Guangdong 510006,China)

机构地区：[1]乌德勒支大学人文学院,荷兰乌德勒支3508 [2]郑州大学外国语与国际关系学院,河南郑州450001 [3]郑州经济技术开发区外国语学校,河南郑州450000 [4]广州大学人文学院,广东广州510006

出　　处：《广州大学学报（社会科学版）》2023年第4期53-65,共13页Journal of Guangzhou University:Social Science Edition

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目(22&ZD287)。

摘　　要：在罗西·布拉伊多蒂看来,传统人文学对人类主体的关注过于狭隘,而大学作为知识生产场所也存在局限性,后人类思想话语的发展历程对我们关于“人”的理解产生了巨大影响。她建议将人文学科重新构想为理解所有实体(人类和非人类)相互关联的更大项目,主张采取更具包容性和多元化的教育方法,承认不同学科领域之间的相互关联和知识的多元性。她呼吁人文学应在应对人类活动对地球带来深刻影响方面发挥作用,推动以环境为基础的新人文主义思想的出现。In Rosi Braidotti′s view,the traditional humanities pay very little attention to the human subject,and universities as places of knowledge production also have their limitations.The development of the discourse of posthuman thoughts has great impact on our understanding of″human″.She recommends that the humanities can be reimagined as a larger project of understanding the interconnectedness of all entities(human and non-human),advocating for a more inclusive and pluralistic approach to education that recognizes the interconnectedness between different subjects and the diversity of knowledge.She strongly suggests that the humanities should play a role in responding to the profound impact of human activities on the earth,and promote the emergence of new humanist ideas based on the environment.

关 键 词：传统人文学 后人类性 后人类话语 人类中心论 

分 类 号：G102[文化科学]