机构地区:[1]山西师范大学地理科学学院,太原030000 [2]山西师范大学黄河中游生态环境研究中心,太原030000 [3]山西师范大学人文地理研究所,太原030000
出 处:《地理学报》2023年第6期1408-1426,共19页Acta Geographica Sinica
基 金:山西师范大学研究生创新项目(2021XSY042);教育部人文社会科学研究项目(20YJC630032)。
摘 要:以中国887个省际边界县域为研究区,从5个维度构建评价指标体系度量其2000—2019年城镇化水平,结合空间自相关分析表征城镇化空间格局演变特征,并运用地理探测器识别主要影响因素及交互关系,在此基础上划分驱动类型区并提出差别化建议。研究结果表明:①2000—2019年中国省际边界区城镇化水平不断提高但整体仍处于较低水平,呈现出东—中—西阶梯状递减的空间分布特征。②中国省际边界县域城镇化水平呈现出显著的空间正相关性,H-H型的县域空间分布呈“T”型格局,L-L类型集聚分布在西北地区、东北地区、西南地区省际边界区。③经济发展类因子和交通因子是省际边界区城镇化空间格局的主导影响因素。④省际边界区城镇化空间格局演变是在经济发展和交通水平主要驱动和直接作用下,医疗水平、社会投资和自然条件次要驱动和直接作用以及政府行为与教育服务间接作用后的结果。⑤按主导因素将省际边界区划分为地形要素制约型、区位交通主导型、经济发展拉动型、社会投资拉动型、公共服务滞后型和政府主导型6类驱动类型区。⑥省际边界区城镇化发展具有空间近邻效应,距离发达地区城市群近的县域城镇化水平高。省际边界区县域城镇化空间的边缘性特征突出,省际边界县域接壤边界数量越多,城镇化水平越低。Selecting 887 inter-provincial border counties in China as a research area,this paper constructs an evaluation index system incorporating five dimensions to measure the degree of urbanization that each county experienced from 2000 to 2019,describes characteristics of the evolution of urbanized spatial patterns combined with spatial autocorrelation analysis,uses geodetectors to identify the main factors influencing urbanization and interactive relationships,divides driving areas into types on the above basis,and proposes targeted suggestions.The results show that:(1)From 2000 to 2019,the urbanization level of China's inter-provincial border areas continued to increase,but the overall level remained low,and displayed a spatial distribution pattern of stepwise decline from east to central to west.(2)The urbanization level of counties on the inter-provincial border showed a significant positive spatial correlation.In terms of spatial distribution,HH-clustering counties formed a"T"pattern,and LL-clustering counties concentrated in the inter-provincial border areas of the northwest,northeast,and southwest.(3)Economic development and traffic level are the leading factors affecting the spatial pattern of urbanization in the inter-provincial border areas.(4)The spatial pattern of urbanization in the inter-provincial border areas results from the main factors directly driving economic development and determining transportation levels.In addition,medical care,social investment,and natural conditions also directly impact the spatial pattern of urbanization.Government behavior and educational services exert indirect effects.(5)Inter-provincial border areas are divided into six types with distinct patterns of leading driving factors:terrain element restriction,location traffic leading,economic development driving,social investment driving,public service lagging,and government leading.(6)Urbanization of inter-provincial border areas exerts a spatial nearest neighbor effect,and the urbanization level of counties close to urban a
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...