检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:龚兆娟 Gong Zhaojuan(Gynecology,Jurong Maternal and Child Health Hospital,Jurong 212400,China)
出 处:《实用妇科内分泌电子杂志》2023年第6期118-120,共3页Electronic Journal of Practical Gynecological Endocrinology
摘 要:目的探究综合护理干预在药物流产不全清宫术中的临床应用效果。方法选取86例药物流产不全清宫术患者,根据随机排列法分为对照组与观察组,每组43例。对照组行常规护理干预,观察组行综合护理干预。对比两组护理效果。结果与对照组比较,观察组患者焦虑自评量表(SAS)及抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分更低(P<0.05);观察组患者风险事件总出现率4.65%低于对照组的18.60%(P<0.05);观察组患者总满意度97.67%高于对照组的86.05%(P<0.05)。结论综合护理干预在药物流产不全清宫术患者中取得了较好的干预效果,值得推广与应用。Objective To explore the clinical application effect of comprehensive nursing intervention in incomplete clearance of uterine abortion.Methods 86 patients with incomplete medical abortion were divided into control group and observation group according to random arrangement,with 43 cases in each group.The control group received routine nursing intervention,and the observation group received comprehensive nursing intervention.The nursing effect of the two groups was compared.Results Compared with control group,the scores of self-rating Anxiety Scale(SAS)and self-rating Depression Scale(SDS)in observation group were lower(P<0.05).The total occurrence rate of risk events in observation group was 4.65%lower than that in control group(18.60%)(P<0.05).The total satisfaction of observation group was 97.67%higher than that of control group(86.05%)(P<0.05).Conclusion Comprehensive nursing intervention has a good effect in the patients with incomplete uterine clearance in medical abortion,and it is worth popularizing and applying.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200