检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵丽莉 陈家辉 Zhao Lili;Chen Jiahui(Institute of Digital Rule of Law,Shandong University of Science and Technology,Qingdao 266590;Institute of Intellectual Property,Shandong University of Science and Technology,Qingdao 266590)
机构地区:[1]山东科技大学数字法治研究院,青岛266590 [2]山东科技大学知识产权学院,青岛266590
出 处:《情报杂志》2023年第7期201-206,200,共7页Journal of Intelligence
基 金:2022年度司法部法治建设与法学理论研究部级科研重点项目“外商投资投资数据安全审查制度研究”(编号:22SFB2004)阶段性成果。
摘 要:[研究目的]为协调区块链的技术特征与个人信息删除权行使可能产生的矛盾,探求区块链技术、应用实践、法律主体与删除权的融合治理之路,提出区块链场景下保障个人信息删除权行使的具体举措。[研究方法]综合运用比较研究,考量区块链技术理念层面、实践层面、法律主体层面与删除权行使如何协同,从而实现区块链技术与删除权的共生共长。[研究结论]法律解释层面:合理法律解释推动区块链技术应用与删除权相适应;技术层面:寻求删除权“可替代”方案和链上链外双重保障机制;主体层面:区分区块链的用途和类型来确定区块链上个人信息控制者。[Research purpose]To reconcile the possible contradictions between the technical features of blockchain and the exercise of the right to erasure of personal information,explore the path of integration of blockchain technology,application practice,legal subjects and the right to erasure for governance,and propose specific measures to guarantee the exercise of the right to erasure of personal information under the blockchain scenario.[Research method]The comparative study is applied to consider how the concept,practice and legal subject of blockchain technology and the exercise of the right to erasure can work together to achieve the symbiosis and co-growth of them.[Research conclusion]Legal interpretation level:reasonable legal interpretation promotes the application of blockchain technology and the right to delete;Technical level:seek"alternative"solutions for deletion rights and off-chain dual guarantee mechanisms;Subject level:distinguish the purpose and type of blockchain to determine the personal information controller on the blockchain.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229