检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:林冈[1] 李林杰 Lin Gang;Li Linjie(Shanghai Jiao Tong University;School of International Studies,Sichuan University)
机构地区:[1]上海交通大学 [2]四川大学国际关系学院
出 处:《台海研究》2023年第1期105-111,共7页Cross-Taiwan Strait Studies
摘 要:所谓“中华民国宪法问题”向来是横亘于两岸之间牵动政、学两界的重大现实问题之一,也是中国内地必须面对的重大实践问题,有必要予以理论澄清、立场辨明与策略谋划,考察其缘由,定位其性质,并探讨处理原则。本文从“制宪权理论”出发,考察“中华民国宪法问题”的缘起,以“制宪权”中“人民”的概念为中介,分析“中华民国宪法”所存在的合法性与分裂性问题。继而回答两岸如何处理“主权单方行使和受益权双方共享”的关系问题,妥善解决“中华民国宪法”这一国共内战的遗留问题。The so-called"Constitution of the Republic of China"has always been a major practical issue between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait which has affected both political and academic circles.It is also a major practical issue that the Chinese mainland is bound to face.Therefore,it is necessary to clarify the theory,identify the position and apply appropriate strategies to this issue,as well as to examine its causes,locate its nature,and explore handling principles.This article examines the origins of the"Constitution of the Republic of China"from the perspective of the"theory of constituent power",and uses the concept of"people"in the"constituent power"as a mediator to analyze the legitimacy and secessionism of the"Constitution of the Republic of China".Moreover,it will explore the question of how to deal with the issue of"unilateral exercise of sovereignty and bilateral sharing of beneficiary right"so that the issue of"the Constitution of the Republic of China"left over by the Chinese civil war between the CPC and the Kuomintang could be handled appropriately.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38