积极还是消极?基层干部污名对行政绩效的双刃剑效应研究  

Positive or Negative?A Study on the Double-edged Sword Effect of Grassroots Cadre Reputation on Administrative Performance

作　　者：任兵 陈志霞[1] 郑玮博 REN Bing;CHEN Zhi-xia;ZHENG Wei-bo(HUST)

机构地区：[1]华中科技大学公共管理学院

出　　处：《华中科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2023年第4期118-128,共11页Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目“武汉超大城市治理现代化:基本逻辑、治理理念与路径构想”(YCJJ202204009);四川省社会科学重点研究基地—中国攀西康养产业研究中心项目“重大疫情应对中攀西康养企业快速反应机制研究”(PXKY-YB-202005);湖北省社科基金重点项目“超大城市现代化治理路径研究”(HBSK2022ZK725-1);国家自然科学基金面上项目“行为公共管理视角下我国公共组织污名研究:内涵结构、双刃剑效应及其机制”(72074091)。

摘　　要：基层干部污名是指公众因偏见和误解将部分基层干部的负面特征刻板化为整个干部群体的共同特征,进而使其社会身份受损的动态过程。干部污名对基层干部形象带来直接威胁进而影响其工作态度和行政绩效,因此研究干部污名的作用机制及其干预策略具有重要的理论和实践意义。基于压力认知评价理论,本文认为积极干预行为和消极退缩行为是基层干部面对干部污名的两种主要应对方式。公共服务动机在上述过程中起着调节作用,影响基层干部积极干预行为或消极退缩行为的选择,且这两类干预方式对基层干部的行政绩效产生截然不同的影响。通过对所搜集的374份两阶段匹配的数据进行分析显示:对高公共服务动机的基层干部而言,干部污名会激发基层干部的积极干预行为,并通过积极干预行为正面影响行政绩效;对低公共服务动机的基层干部而言,干部污名会引发基层干部的消极退缩行为,并通过消极退缩行为负面影响行政绩效。Stigmatization of grassroots cadres is a dynamic process in which the public stereotypes the negative characteristics of individual grassroots cadres as the common characteristics of the whole cadre group due to prejudice and misunderstanding,and damages their social identity.As cadre stigma poses a direct threat to the image of grassroots cadres and affects their work attitude and administrative performance,it is of great theoretical and practical significance to study the mechanism of cadre stigma and its intervention strategies.Based on the transactional theory of stress,this paper argues that positive intervention behavior and negative withdrawal behavior are the two main coping ways of grassroots cadres in the face of cadre stigma.Public service motivation plays a moderating role in the above process,influencing the choice of positive intervention behavior or negative withdrawal behavior of grassroots cadres,and these two types of interventions have different effects on the administrative performance of grassroots cadres.We analyzed 374 two-stage matched data and the results showed that:for the grassroots cadres with high public service motivation,cadre stigma triggers positive intervention behavior of grassroots cadres and positively affects administrative performance through it;however,for the grassroots cadres with low public service motivation,cadre stigma triggers negative withdrawal behavior of grassroots cadres and negatively affects administrative performance through it.

关 键 词：干部污名 公共服务动机 积极干预行为 消极退缩行为 行政绩效 

分 类 号：D262[政治法律—政治学]