建筑施工噪声污染侵权责任研究  

On Tort Liability for Construction Noise Pollution

作　　者：冯广林 乔飞淏 列子恩 FENG Guang-lin;QIAO Fei-hao;LIE Zi-en(School of Law,Guizhou Minzu University,Guiyang 550025,Guizhou,China)

机构地区：[1]贵州民族大学法学院,贵州贵阳550025

出　　处：《贵阳学院学报（社会科学版）》2023年第3期87-92,共6页Journal of Guiyang University:Social Sciences

摘　　要：在噪声污染责任纠纷中,原告对损害事实的证明标准是否因“达标排放”有所不同,提供的证据不足时法院对原告主张的损害赔偿金额行使自由裁量权。在司法实践中应统一适用过错推定为噪声污染的归责原则,一般主体也可以成为“噪声污染侵权人”,承担噪声污染损害赔偿责任,从而明确噪声污染侵权损害金额法官酌定的评估标准或参考因素。In the dispute over noise pollution liability,the plaintiff's standard of proof for the damage facts differs depending on whether the "emission meets the standard" is provided.When the evidence provided is insufficient,the court exercises discretion over the amount of damage compensation claimed by the plaintiff.In judicial practice,the principle of imputation of fault as noise pollution should be uniformly applied,by which the general subject can also become a "noise pollution infringer",bearing the responsibility for compensation for noise pollution damage.And the judge's evaluation criteria or reference factors for the amount of noise pollution infringement damage should be clarified.

关 键 词：噪声污染 污染者 侵权责任 归责原则 

分 类 号：D922.68[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学]