检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:蒋逸天 Jiang Yitian
出 处:《南海法学》2023年第3期91-99,共9页The South China Sea Law Journal
摘 要:政府数据开放中个人信息保护的法治逻辑,目前尚未得到理论界的充分厘清,有待加以深入研究。在政法论逻辑上,政府数据开放中的个人信息保护强调国家和政府的“出场”,但同样需要贯彻行政法治的控权论理念。在价值论逻辑上,政府数据开放的过程面临公益与私益的复杂博弈,公共利益本位论是其根本价值遵循。在方法论逻辑上,运用综合性判断标准以确定政府数据开放中个人信息的保护强度,兼顾技术性标准和社会性标准。在具体保护模式上,采用监管逻辑与救济逻辑的双阶构造,以行政自制理念为引导落实具体政府监管制度,同时构建申诉、复议与诉讼的三维救济路径。At present,the legal logic of personal information protection in government data opening has not been fully clarified by the theoretical circle and needs to be further studied.In the logic of political and legal theory,the protection of personal information in the opening of government data emphasizes the"appearance"of the state and the government,but it also needs to implement the concept of liberal power control theory.In terms of axiological logic,the process of government data opening is faced with a complex game between public and private interests.We should be vigilant against the erosion of economic logic on public interests.In terms of methodological logic,we should use comprehensive judgment criteria to determine the protection intensity of personal information in government data opening,taking into account technical standards and social standards.In the specific protection mode,we should adopt the double-stage structure of supervision logic and relief logic,implement the specific government supervision system under the guidance of the concept of administrative self-control,and build a three-dimensional relief path of appeal,reconsideration and litigation.
关 键 词:政府数据开放 个人信息保护 监管逻辑 控权论 行政法治
分 类 号:D922.16[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学] D922.1[政治法律—法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.14.128.23