检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郭薇 Guo Wei(School of Liberal Arts,Minnan Normal University,Zhangzhou,Fujian 363000)
出 处:《嘉兴学院学报》2023年第4期89-96,共8页Journal of Jiaxing University
摘 要:明人孙七政《松韵堂集》收《松声赋》一篇,与他同时期的瞿汝稷《瞿冏卿集》中亦收录此赋,惟文字略有差异。同邑张应遴于万历三十八年(1610)辑《海虞文苑》,选录孙、瞿二人《松声赋》时,却为两篇不同之赋。其中,孙七政赋为《松声赋·粤有逃虚之士》,瞿汝稷赋为《松声赋·乔松偃蹇兮山之崖》。结合《海虞文苑》及相关史料可知,瞿氏集中误收孙赋,当与二人交游有关;瞿氏集中不收其本来之赋,亦与其作品在当时即已散佚相关。Ming Dynasty scholar Sun Qizheng included a piece of“Songsheng Fu”in his Songyun Tang Ji,while Qu Ruji also included this fu in his Qu Jiongqing Ji with slight differences in writing.In the 38 th year of Emperor Wanli s reign(1610),Zhang Yinglin,a fellow townsman of the two,compiled Haiyu Wenyuan and included“Songsheng Fu”once collected respectively by Sun and Qu,but in his compilation,they were two different pieces of fu.Sun's piece is titled“Songsheng Fu:A Hermit in Yue”,and Qu's is titled“Songsheng Fu:Blue Pines Stand Erect at the Cliff”.Based on Haiyu Wenyuan and related historical materials,it can be concluded that the Qu family mistakenly collected Sun's fu in Qu's collection for the two were friends and communicated frequently.Qu's collection failed to contain Qu's own“Songsheng Fu”because his works were already scattered and lost at that time.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.13