检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:丁国民[1] 陈子剑 DING Guomin;CHEN Zijian(School of Law,Fuzhou University,Fuzhou,Fujian 350108,China)
出 处:《南京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版)》2023年第3期117-124,共8页Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics(Social Sciences)
基 金:国家社会科学基金青年项目(20CFX052)。
摘 要:公平竞争审查例外规定兼具平衡公共利益追求与维护市场竞争秩序双重功能。然而当下自我审查模式存在审查意愿不强、审查质量不高、审查监督欠缺的逻辑悖论,无法真正防范例外规定滥用。对适用例外规定的外部审查模式探索也因可操作性不强、权责配置不清、规制实效不足难担实践重任。从现实可行性、科层逻辑性、规制实效性三维度审视,例外规定适用的审查模式完善应回归行政体系内部上下级双重审查逻辑,构建政策制定机关初步审查+适用例外规定时上一级行政机关再审查模式,以彰显例外规定运行的规范性与审慎性。The fair competition review exception provisions have the dual functions of balancing the pursuit of pub-lic interests and maintaining the order of market competition.However,the current self-censorship model has logi-cal paradoxes,such as a weak willingness to review,low quality of review,and lack of review supervision,which cannot truly prevent the abuse of exception provisions.The exploration of the external review mode of the applica-tion of exceptions is also difficult to carry out due to poor operability,unclear allocation of powers and responsibili-ties,and insufficient regulatory effectiveness.Examined from the three dimensions of practical feasibility,bureau-cratic logic,and regulatory effectiveness,the improvement of the review mode applicable to the exception provi-sions should return to the logic of dual review within the administrative system at the upper and lower levels,and construct the preliminary review by the policy-making authority plus the application of exceptions.The mode of re-examination of the agency is to demonstrate the normative and prudent operation of the exceptions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117