机构地区:[1]扬州大学临床医学院,江苏省苏北人民医院麻醉科,扬州225001 [2]扬州大学临床医学院,江苏省苏北人民医院心功能检查科,扬州225001
出 处:《国际麻醉学与复苏杂志》2023年第6期605-609,共5页International Journal of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation
基 金:国家自然科学基金(81601679)。
摘 要:目的评价肺复张诱导主动脉瓣速度时间积分(velocity time integral,VTI)变化评估肺保护性通气患者容量反应性的准确性。方法择期全麻下行胃肠手术的患者45例,年龄50~70岁,ASA分级Ⅰ、Ⅱ级,左室射血分数(left ventricular ejection fractions,LVEF)>55%。所有患者全麻诱导气管插管后行肺保护性通气[潮气量7 ml/kg,呼气末正压(positive end expiratory pressure,PEEP)5 cmH_(2)O(1 cmH_(2)O=0.098 kPa)通气,FIO_(2)60%],待血流动力学平稳后,给予一次肺复张(lung recruitment maneuver,RM)。于心尖五腔心切面,将脉冲多普勒取样点置于距主动脉瓣1 cm之内,描记VTI。记录RM前后VTI、MAP和心率,并计算速度时间积分变异度(velocity time integral variation,△VTI)、平均动脉压变异度(mean arterial pressure variation,△MAP)和心率变异度(heart rate variation,△HR)。暂将潮气量改为9 ml/kg并连接Vigileo系统后行容量负荷试验(volume expansion,VE),记录容量负荷试验前后每搏量(stroke volume,SV),并计算每搏量变异率(stroke volume variation,△SV)。依据△SV将患者分为两组:有反应组(R组,△SV≥15%,26例)和无反应组(N组,△SV<15%,19例)。采用受试者工作特征(receiver operating characteristic,ROC)曲线对△VTI、△MAP和△HR进行分析,并计算最佳Youden指数时各指标值,评价RM诱导△VTI评估肺保护性通气患者容量反应性的准确性。结果与RM前比较,两组患者RM后MAP、VTI均明显下降(P<0.05);两组患者RM前后心率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。与N组比较,R组△HR升高(P<0.05),△MAP和△VTI降低(P<0.05)。ROC曲线分析结果示:△VTI预测肺保护性通气患者容量反应性阳性的诊断阈值为18.065%,灵敏度为92.3%,特异度为73.7%,曲线下面积(area under curve,AUC)为0.893(95%CI 0.800~0.986,P<0.05);△MAP预测肺保护性通气患者容量反应性阳性的诊断阈值为11.120%,灵敏度为73.1%,特异度为84.2%,AUC为0.864(95%CI 0.762~0.967,P<0.05);△HR预测肺保护�Objective To evaluate the accuracy of changes in aortic valve velocity time integral(VTI)induced by lung recruitment maneuver for evaluating fluid responsiveness in patients with lung-protective ventilation.Methods A total of 45 patients,aged 50 to 70 years,American Society of Anesthesiologists(ASA)classⅠorⅡ,with>55%left ventricular ejection fractions(LVEF),who underwent elective gastrointestinal surgery under general anesthesia were enrolled.After tracheal intubation under general anes⁃thesia,all the patients underwent lung-protective ventilation[tidal volume 7 ml/kg,positive end expiratory pressure(PEEP)5 cmH_(2)O (1 cmH_(2)O=0.098 kPa), and FiO_(2) 60%]. When hemodynamics became stable, single lung recruitment maneuver (RM) was performed. In the apical five chamber view, the pulse Doppler sampling point was placed within 1 cm of the aortic valve to record the aortic valve VTI. Furthermore, VTI, MAP and heart rate were recorded before and after lung recruitment maneuver, and velocity time integral varia⁃tion (△VTI), mean arterial pressure variation (△MAP), and heart rate variation (△HR) were calculated. Then, the tidal volume was changed to 9 ml/kg and the Vigileo system was collected to perform the volume expansion (VE) test. The stroke volume (SV) was record⁃ed before and after the VE test and stroke volume variation (△SV) was calculated. According to △SV, the patients were divided into two groups: a response group (group R, △SV≥15%, n=26) and a non-response group (group N, △SV<15%, n=19). A receiver operat⁃ing characteristic curve was plotted to analyze the △VTI, △MAP and △HR, and each indicator was calculated at the optimal Youden index. The accuracy of RM in evaluating fluid responsiveness in patients with lung-protective ventilation was evaluated. ResultsCompared with those before RM, both groups showed significant decreases in MAP and VTI after RM (P<0.05), and there were no sta⁃tistical differences in heart rate before and after RM in the two groups (P>0.05). Compared
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...