评郭沫若的楚辞研究  

Comment on Guo Moruo's Research on Chuci

作　　者：周秉高 ZHOU Binggao(Editorial Department of Lucheng Academic Journal,Baotou,014035,China)

机构地区：[1]《鹿城学刊》编辑部,内蒙古包头014035

出　　处：《云梦学刊》2023年第4期43-50,共8页Journal of Yunmeng

摘　　要：郭沫若的楚辞研究,在中国近现代史上做出了重大贡献,其功劳不可抹杀,然亦存不少可商之处。第一,关于屈原的生年,其说法十分可疑;第二,郭沫若凭想象勾勒出屈原放逐的路线,与屈原诗作和史籍所载完全背道而驰;第三,其创作的屈原自杀故事,决非事情真相;第四,谓《离骚》是屈原的“绝命辞”,其说亦非;第五,关于《天问》错简问题,其观点更是前后矛盾;第六,关于《九歌》的写作年代,断然推翻王逸、朱熹等人的传统说法,失之轻率。Mr.Guo Moruo's(郭沫若) research on Chuci(楚辞) has made great contributions to China's modern and contemporary history.But there are also some areas for discussion:Firstly,Mr.Guo's statement about Qu Yuan's birth year is very doubtful.Secondly,the exile route outlined by Mr.Guo based on his imagination completely contradicts Qu Yuan's poetry and historical records;Thirdly,Mr.Guo created the story of Qu Yuan's suicide,but it is by no means the truth;Fourthly,it is not true that Li Sao(《离骚》) is Qu Yuan's “desperate speech”.Fifthly,there is a inconsistency between Mr.Guo's viewpoints on the disordering of bamboo slips in Tian Wen(《天问》);Sixthly,regarding the writing time of Jiuge(《九歌》),Mr.Guo decisively overturned the traditional views of Wang Yi(王逸),Zhu Xi(朱熹),and others,which was reckless.

关 键 词：郭沫若 楚辞研究 贡献 商榷 

分 类 号：I207.22[文学—中国文学]