检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:石拓[1,2] 张俊辉 李丹阳 宋智洋[1] SHI Tuo;ZHANG Junhui;LI Danyang;SONG Zhiyang(Department of Public Security Management,Beijing Police College,Beijing 102202,China;Artificial Intelligence Development Research Center,Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China,Beijing 100038,China;Public Security Traffic Management Bureau of Beijing Public Security Bureau,Beijing 100037,China)
机构地区:[1]北京警察学院公安管理系,北京102202 [2]中国科学技术信息研究所人工智能发展研究中心,北京100038 [3]北京市公安局公安交通管理局,北京100037
出 处:《运筹与管理》2023年第6期27-32,共6页Operations Research and Management Science
基 金:国家社科基金青年项目(21CSH005)。
摘 要:随着人工智能在社会治安治理领域应用日趋深入,其嵌入治安治理的实践逻辑已不再是单向度的技术创新,而是包括推动形成多元主体协同共治模式、倒逼治安治理配套制度体系升级、驱动治理手段技术化转型的多向度赋权。与此同时智能技术加速升级所引发的治理主体结构性失调、治理制度失效,以及技术异化,也产生了社会公平被破坏、治理体系混乱、过度技术依赖等风险。为寻得风险因应之道,本文建立以公安机关为代表的政府部门、人工智能企业、公众主体三方利益相关主体的演化博弈模型,并对模型演化策略进行分析。结果表明:以公安机关为代表的政府部门需要主动作为,全面统筹人工智能嵌入下多元主体间的结构关系,推动形成多元主体协同共治格局、跟进完善配套制度、加快构建“社会善治”的人工智能技术治理体系,以全方位促进人工智能嵌入社会治安治理良性发展的因应之道。As artificial intelligence becomes increasingly ingrained in the realm of public security and governance,its practical application transcends unidimensional technological innovation.It now encompasses the development of a multi-stakeholder collaborative governance model,compels the upgrading of supporting public security systems,and drives the transition of governance methods towards more technologically advanced means.Simultaneously,the rapid advancement of intelligent technologies has resulted in structural imbalances among governance actors,the inadequacy of governance systems,and technological alienation,giving rise to risks such as social inequality,disarray within governance systems,and an overreliance on technology.Therefore,it is crucial to elucidate the evolving interplay among various actors in the context of artificial intelligence embedded in public security governance,while strengthening forward-looking prevention,constraint guidance,and formulating effective risk mitigation strategies.This approach is of both theoretical and practical value for harnessing artificial intelligence to enhance public security management more effectively.This article establishes an evolutionary game model involving three key stakeholders:Government departments(represented by public security agencies),artificial intelligence companies,and the general public.And then it analyzes behavior strategies of the tripartite stakeholders in the scenario of artificial intelligence embedded in social security governance.By examining the strategic combinations chosen by these three interest groups,a game payoff matrix is constructed.Through the analysis of three-party replicator dynamic equations,the equilibrium points and stability of the evolutionary game among the three parties are determined.The findings indicate that government departments,exemplified by public security agencies,must proactively coordinate the structural relationships among various stakeholders in the realm of artificial intelligence integration.It is crucial to
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28