检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨凡 杜德斌[2,3] 段德忠[2,3] 史文天 YANG Fan;DU Debin;DUAN Dezhong;SHI Wentian(Institute of Information,Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences,Shanghai 200235,China;Institute for Global Innovation and Development,East China Normal University,Shanghai 200062,China;School of Urban and Regional Science,East China Normal University,Shanghai 200241,China;Department of Hospitality Management,Shanghai Business School,Shanghai 201400,China)
机构地区:[1]上海社会科学院信息研究所,上海200235 [2]华东师范大学全球创新与发展研究院,上海200062 [3]华东师范大学城市与区域科学学院,上海200241 [4]上海商学院酒店管理学院,上海201400
出 处:《资源科学》2023年第3期668-682,共15页Resources Science
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(42101181);上海市哲学社会科学规划青年课题(2020EJL004);上海市浦江人才计划资助项目(2020PJC088);国家社会科学基金重大项目(21ZDA011)。
摘 要:【目的】从多尺度视角揭示长三角产学协同创新的空间格局、组织模式及其演化过程,提出新发展格局下区域产学一体化的空间优化对策及建议。【方法】基于2001—2020年长三角专利数据和多元化产学合作模式,深度挖掘产学协同关系的空间信息,通过测度强度与中心性指标,识别城市发展与区域协同模式。【结果】(1)长三角产学协同创新经历了从地方化向区域化发展的历程,但区内合作比例有下降趋势,同时出现再地化倾向;(2)长三角产学协同创新的空间均衡性不断提升,但区外合作进一步集聚,城际网络向单中心、轴辐式和多层级结构演化;(3)大学资源有助于城市产学协同创新的尺度扩张和内生发展,从而获得更高的网络地位,并在多尺度知识交互中发挥重要的桥接功能。【结论】长三角区内产学合作相对于本地和全国尺度而言仍有较大发展潜力,需要加强区域产学资源的有效流动,重视其在推动一体化协同中的功能定位差异。[Objective] The objective of this study was to reveal the multi-scale spatial patterns,organization,and evolution of university-industry(U-I) collaborative innovation in the Yangtze River Delta region,and propose policy recommendations for the spatial optimization of regional UI integration in China's new development stage.[Methods] Based on the patent data from 2001 to2020 and the diversified cooperation models,the spatial information of U-I linkages were explored,and the urban development and regional synergy models were identified by measuring the strength and centrality indicators.[Results](1) As the output of U-I collaborative innovation continued to grow,intercity cooperation was becoming more frequent,and the scale and scope were gradually expanding.Although most small and medium-sized cities preferred intra-regional cooperation,its proportion showed a downward trend because the core cities preferred inter-regional cooperation.(2) With the improvement of the U-I collaborative innovation capabilities of small and mediumsized cities,regional development had changed from relying on the core cities to urban agglomerations for coordinated development,while the spatial imbalance of the internal network of the Yangtze River Delta had been declining.Under the strong influence of Beijing,cooperation outside the region became further agglomerated.In general,the U-I integration had evolved into a single-center,hub-and-spoke,and multi-level structure at the network level,strong administrative barriers existed,the connection between regional subnetworks was not close enough,and the leading function of the core cities such as Shanghai needed to be enhanced.(3) The Yangtze River Delta cities are promoting multi-scale U-I cooperation.Especially under the influence of regional integration policies,most cities tend to strengthen local and regional cooperation compared with cooperation outside the region.The evolution of the urban development models has driven the flattening of the regional hierarchical system and is also co
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.168