检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨光 史波芬 周传斌[1,2] YANG Cuang;SHI Bo-fen;ZHOU Chuan-bin(State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology,Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100085,China;College of Resources and Environment,University of Chinese Academyof Sciences,Beijing 101408,China;China Construction Technology Consulting Co.,Ltd.,Beijing 100032,China)
机构地区:[1]中国科学院生态环境研究中心城市与区域生态国家重点实验室,北京100085 [2]中国科学院大学资源与环境学院,北京101408 [3]中国城市建设研究院有限公司,北京100032
出 处:《环境科学》2023年第6期3024-3033,共10页Environmental Science
基 金:国家重点研发计划项目(2018YFC1903601);万科公益基金会项目。
摘 要:随着我国大力推动生活垃圾分类管理工作,厨余垃圾的资源化利用受到越来越多关注.厨余垃圾资源化技术已有包括厌氧消化处理、好氧生物处理和昆虫饲料转化等类型,但在已有应用案例中存在资源化程度低、环境影响显著和经济效益差等诸多问题,缺乏技术绩效的系统化分析和综合性评价.为此,研究面向厨余垃圾资源化技术应用的全生命周期过程,构建了资源效率、环境影响、经济可行和社会效应的多维绩效评价指标体系(包括21项指标),以我国的14项典型技术应用项目为案例开展定量化综合评价研究.结果表明,厌氧消化和昆虫饲料转化处理技术的得分分别为58.39分和59.65分,高于好氧生物处理(49.16分);按细分技术类型,集中式黑水虻转化和中温湿式厌氧工艺得分较高,分别为67.14分和60.82分.按技术的处理规模和设施分布方式,集中式处理技术在资源效率和经济效益维度上分别比分散式技术高出13%和62%;分散式处理技术在环境影响和社会效应维度上比集中式高出8%和34%.在厨余垃圾资源化实践中,应结合当地的厨余垃圾理化性质、生活垃圾分类收集工作推进情况、财政承担能力和收运距离等多因素综合考量,因地制宜的选择适宜技术路线.In recent years,China has made great efforts to carry out source-separation in municipal solid waste management;in particular,the utilization of food waste has received increasing attention.Food waste-utilizing technologies,including anaerobic digestion,aerobic biological treatment,and insect feed conversion,are currently applied in China.However,in the existing cases,there were several disadvantages,such as a low rate of utilization,significant environmental impacts,poor economic benefits,etc.,as well as a lack of systematic analysis and comprehensive assessment of the performances of food waste utilization technologies.In this study,a four-dimensional performance assessment method(resource efficiency,environmental impact,economic feasibility,and social effect,with 21 indicators)was established for assessing the life cycle process of food waste utilization technologies.We collected detailed information of 14 typical food waste utilization cases in China,and the results showed that the average scores of anaerobic digestion and insect feed conversion were 58.39 and 59.65,higher than those of the aerobic biological treatment(49.16).The highest scores among all subdivision technologies were centralized black soldier fly conversion and mesophilic wet anaerobic digestion,which were 67.14 and 60.82,respectively.With respect to the technologies of different treatment capacities and distribution modes,i.e.,centralized and decentralized technologies,the resource efficiency and economic benefit scores of the former were 13%and 62%higher than those of the latter,whereas the environmental impacts and social effect scores of the latter were 8%and 34%greater than those of the former,respectively.In practice,the utilization technology of food waste should be chosen according to local conditions,such as the physical and chemical properties of food waste,the classification of municipal solid waste,financial affordability,collection and transportation distance,etc.
关 键 词:厨余垃圾 技术 多维绩效评价 厌氧消化 好氧生物处理 昆虫饲料转化
分 类 号:X705.5[环境科学与工程—环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249