固定床间歇气化与纯氧连续气化技术对比分析  

Comparative analysis of fixed-bed intermittent gasification and pure-oxygen continuous gasification technologies

作　　者：郭彦江 Guo Yanjiang(Coal Chemical Industry Business Department of Jinneng Holding Equipment Manufacturing Group,Jincheng Shanxi 048006,China)

机构地区：[1]晋能控股装备制造集团煤化工事业部,山西晋城048006

出　　处：《煤化工》2023年第3期38-41,共4页Coal Chemical Industry

摘　　要：固定床间歇气化技术受到环保、能耗等因素的影响,正在逐年淘汰关停,作为同源替代的连续纯氧气化技术受到关注。从政策导向、工厂实际运行参数、吨氨综合成本、吨氨综合能耗等方面对两种气化技术进行了分析比较,可为相关固定床间歇气化技术改造提供参考。Affected by such factors as environmental protection and energy consumption,the fixed-bed intermittent gasification technology is being phased out and shut down year by year,and the pure-oxygen continuous gasification technology,which is a homologous replacement,has drawn great attention.The two gasification technologies were analyzed and compared from the perspectives of policy orientation,actual factory operating parameters,comprehensive cost and energy consumption per ton of ammonia,which could provide reference for the renovation of related fixed-bed intermittent gasification technology.

关 键 词：固定床间歇气化 纯氧连续气化 技术分析 成本分析 综合能耗 

分 类 号：TQ546[化学工程—煤化学工程]