检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:方玮蓉 马成俊[2] Fang Weirong;Ma Chengjun
机构地区:[1]天津大学管理与经济学部,天津市300072 [2]青海民族大学,西宁市810007
出 处:《中国边疆史地研究》2023年第2期99-108,215,共11页China's Borderland History and Geography Studies
基 金:2020年国家社科基金冷门绝学项目“清民国时期青海藏事司法档案整理与研究”(20VJXG007)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:在晚清循化厅藏族部落的纠纷解决机制中,乡老、部落头人等群体是重要参与者,并与纠纷两造同时组成解纷机制的基本构造。清代藏族部落纠纷有“细故”和“重情”二类,民间力量在其中分别承担着“调解人”和“承保人”的不同角色,部落冲突类型也因其存在于独立部落及部落联盟间而有所不同。通过对晚清部落解纷机制的类型化分析,可知大国治理中心和边疆地区的不同。In the dispute resolution mechanism of Tibetan tribes in Xunhua Ting during the late Qing Dynasty,village elders,tribal leaders and other groups are important participants,together with the two parties in the dispute,formed the basic structure of dispute resolution.The disputes were divided into two categories:“Xigu”(Civil)and“Zhongqing”(Criminal),in which civil forces assumed different roles of“mediator”and“warrantors”respectively,and tribal conflicts also differed because some were between independent tribes,some others were between tribal alliances.Through the typological analysis of the tribal dispute resolution mechanism in Xunhua Ting during the late Qing,we can see the difference of governance between the central plains and surrounding areas.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38