侦查假说的概念内涵及其认知二重性——兼论科学假说与侦查假说之关系  

Investigation Hypothesis: Concept Connotation and Cognitive Duality——On the Relationship between Science Hypothesis and Investigation Hypothesis

作　　者：黎红勤 Li Hong-qin(School of Marxism,Guangdong Police College,Guangzhou 510230,China)

机构地区：[1]广东警官学院马克思主义学院,广东广州510230

出　　处：《政法学刊》2023年第3期26-33,共8页Journal of Political Science and Law

基　　金：广东警官学院资助项目“概率的主观主义解释及其在侦查工作中的应用”(2020QNGG07)。

摘　　要：澄清侦查假说与科学假说之关系是明确侦查假说概念内涵的可行进路。侦查假说的同源性替代论题主张,作为科学假说的子类,侦查假说不过是其在侦查领域的应用。同源性替代论题着重突出科学认知在侦查假说中的构成性作用,但其缺陷在于尚未意识到侦查假说具有认知二重性,是科学认知与常识认知的产物。为化解侦查科学化可能带来的唯证据论与侦查扁平化风险,运用科学认知规范侦查活动之余,要赋予常识认知其内在价值。Clarifying the relationship betwen investigation hypothesis and science hypothesis is a feasible way to clarify the concept connotation of investigation hypothesis.The topic of homology substitution of investigation hypothesis advocates that,as a subcategory of science hypothesis,investigation hypothesis is only its application in the field of investigation.The topic of homology substitution emphasizes the constructive role of science cognition in the investigation hypothesis,but its defect is that it is not aware of the cognitive duality of the investigation hypothesis,which is the product of science cognition and common sense cognition.In order to resolve the risk of evidence-only and investigation fattening that may be brought about by scientific investigation,we should not only use science cognition to standardize investigation activities,but also endow common sense with its intrinsic value.

关 键 词：侦查假说 科学假说 科学认知 常识认知 

分 类 号：D918[政治法律—法学]