我国刑法学理论中不应当再使用“客观处罚条件”  

“Objective punishment conditions”should no longer be used in China’s criminal law theory

作　　者：李阜蒙 储陈城[1] LI Fu-meng;CHU Chen-cheng(School of Law,Anhui University,Hefei 230601,China)

机构地区：[1]安徽大学法学院,安徽合肥230601

出　　处：《哈尔滨师范大学社会科学学报》2023年第3期61-65,共5页Journal of Social Science of Harbin Normal University

基　　金：国家社科基金后期资助项目“利益衡量视角下刑法规制尖端网络技术问题研究”(21FFXB071)。

摘　　要：当前我国刑法学界似乎对德日学说中的客观处罚条件存在某种程度的误解,客观处罚条件原本是为扩大刑罚处罚,其产生之初就在一定程度上存在着背反责任主义的嫌疑。在我国刑事立法“定性+定量”相结合的模式下,只有造成一定程度危害社会的结果才能构成犯罪,完全可以将所谓的“客观处罚条件”还原为构成要件内容,并受责任原则的限定,无需借助这一备受争议的概念来理解现行刑法中的某些规定。At present,China’s criminal law academia seems to have a certain degree of misunderstanding about the objective punishment conditions in the German and Japanese theories.The objective punishment conditions were originally intended to expand the penalty punishment,and there was a suspicion of being against the responsibility doctrine at the beginning of its emergence.Under the mode of combining“qualitative and quantitative”in China’s criminal legislation,only the result that causes a certain degree of harm to the society can constitute a crime.The so-called“objective punishment conditions”can be completely reduced to the content of the constituent elements,and are limited by the principle of responsibility.It is not necessary to use this controversial concept to understand some provisions in the current criminal law.

关 键 词：客观处罚条件 刑罚构成事由 构成要件 责任原则 

分 类 号：D920.0[政治法律—法学]