检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵健廷 马彪[2] ZHAO Jian-ting;MA Biao(Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing 210024,China;Wuxi Taihu College,Wuxi 214026,China)
机构地区:[1]南京师范大学,江苏南京210024 [2]无锡太湖学院,江苏无锡214026
出 处:《哈尔滨师范大学社会科学学报》2023年第3期125-130,共6页Journal of Social Science of Harbin Normal University
摘 要:以往学界关于晋末政局变迁的研究十分丰富,但是从士族性格以及从权力格局的组合与变迁作为视角研究晋末门阀政治的则比较欠缺。以皇权、门阀集团、士族性格为视角对这段变迁史进行细微考察,可以发现孝武帝及其集团恢复皇权失败实际上对晋末格局产生了严重的破坏,而桓玄集团篡位举动也并非复兴东晋门阀社会。Previous studies on the political changes at the end of the Jin Dynasty are abundant,but there is a lack of studies on the gatekeeper politics at the end of the Jin Dynasty from the perspective of the character of the scholarly clans and the combination and changes of the power pattern.A closer examination of the history of this change from the perspective of imperial power,gatekeeper groups,and the character of the scholarly clan reveals that the failure of Emperor Xiaowu and his group to restore imperial power actually caused serious damage to the late Jin pattern,and the usurpation of the throne by Huan Xuan's group was not a revival of the Eastern Jin gatekeeper society.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.139.239.16