检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王新超[1] 马强[1] 张松[1] 李阳[1] 李安萌 WANG Xin-chao;MA Qiang;ZHANG Song;LI Yang;LI An-meng(China Petroleum Pipeline Engineering Corporation,Hebei Langfang 065000,China)
机构地区:[1]中国石油天然气管道工程有限公司,河北廊坊065000
出 处:《广州化工》2023年第8期179-182,共4页GuangZhou Chemical Industry
摘 要:针对气力输送过程中含尘气体通过管道会产生压降,增加能耗等问题。本文着重对几种常见的计算管道摩擦阻力的经验或半经验式进行分析比较,通过量化计算和理论分析结合的方法比较其差异性和适用范围。影响压降的关键因素在于含尘气流的管道摩擦阻力。在不同入口气体速度和入口颗粒浓度工况下,应合理选用各个经验或半经验式公式,以保证计算的准确性。During the pneumatic conveying process,the dust-laden gas would generate pressure drop through the pipeline,which would increase the energy consumption.The key factor affecting the pressure drop was the frictional resistance of the dust-laden airflow.The analysis and comparison of several common empirical or semi-empirical formulas for calculating the frictional resistance of pipelines was focused,and their differences and scope of application through the combination of quantitative calculation and theoretical analysis was compared.When inlet gas velocity or particle concentration changing,formula shall be reasonably selected to ensure the accuracy of calculation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222