科研论文颠覆性与参考文献年龄之间的关系研究  

Research on the Relationship between the Disruption of Scientific Papers and the Age of References

作　　者：刘小慧 朱曼曼 Liu Xiaohui

机构地区：[1]山东师范大学图书馆,山东济南250014 [2]江苏大学科技信息研究所,江苏镇江212013

出　　处：《情报理论与实践》2023年第7期60-66,共7页Information Studies:Theory & Application

摘　　要：[目的/意义]揭示不同年龄的参考文献对促进知识创新的作用规律。[方法/过程]以物理学2006年发表的SCI论文为例,计算每篇论文在D算法、Rela_DZ算法和DZ算法3种算法下的颠覆性指数,综合运用统计描述和线性回归、分位数回归,从参考文献年龄的跨度和多样性两个方面,研究科研论文颠覆性与参考文献年龄之间的关系。[结果/结论]参考文献年龄跨度和多样性都对科研论文的3种颠覆性指数有负向影响,但是所有回归分析的结果中3个模型的拟合R2都偏低,但结论一致,即参考文献年龄对科研论文颠覆性指数的影响并不明显,因此操纵参考文献年龄的非科学引用并不会影响颠覆性指数的评价结果。[Purpose/significance]Reveal the effect of reference age on promoting knowledge innovation.[Method/process]Taking the SCI papers published in physics in 2006 as an example,calculate the disruptive index of each paper by the three algorithms,and then study the relationship between disruptive index of papers and reference age by statistical description,linear regression and quantile regression.[Result/conclusion]Both the age span and diversity of references have a negative impact on three disruptive indexes,but the fitting R2 of the three models in all the results of regression analysis is low and the conclusion is consistent,that is,the influence of reference age on the disruptive indexes is not obvious.Therefore,non-scientific citing that manipulated reference age did not affect the evaluation results of the disruptive index.

关 键 词：颠覆性指数 参考文献年龄 原创性 非科学引用 科研评价 

分 类 号：G353.1[文化科学—情报学]