检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王娟 毛盟 吴培源 贺攀红 阿丽莉[1,2] WANG Juan;MAO Meng;WU Pei-yuan;HE Pan-hong;A Li-li(Henan Province Nuclear Geology,Zhengzhou 450044,China;Henan Nuclear Industry Radioactive Nuclide Test Center,Zhengzhou 450044,China)
机构地区:[1]河南省核工业地质局,河南郑州450044 [2]河南省核工业放射性核素检测中心,河南郑州450044
出 处:《化学工程师》2023年第7期31-34,共4页Chemical Engineer
基 金:河南省省财政地质勘查项目(豫自然资发[2019]22号;豫自然资发[2021]16号)。
摘 要:铬(Ⅵ)是土壤环境质量标准中规定的必测指标之一,对比两种测定方法的稳定性和准确性,解决标准方法测定结果的不稳定性和低含量样品测定的准确性。本文采用Na_(2)CO_(3)-Na OH碱性混合液作为提取液,通过恒温水浴振荡浸提土壤样品,再经冷却、过滤、调节pH值后分别用火焰原子吸收分光光谱仪(AAS)和电感耦合等离子体发射光谱仪(ICP-OES)测定。结果表明,AAS法测定时吸光值小,灵敏度低,结果不稳定,而ICP-OES法灵敏度高,干扰小;当样品量为5.00g时,ICP-OES方法检出限(0.10mg·kg^(-1))、相对标准偏差(n=7,0.92%~1.22%)低于AAS(0.54mg·kg^(-1),2.43%~4.23%);标准物质验证实验结果相对误差也表现为ICP-OES法(0.38%)低于AAS法(3.87%),实际样品中铬(Ⅵ)的加标回收率分别为96.47%~103.40%(ICP-OES)和85.56%~117.43%(AAS)。ICP-OES法检出限低且具有良好的重复性、准确性与回收率,更适用于低浓度环境土壤监测领域。Hexavalent chromium is one of the necessary indexes stipulated in soil environmental quality standard.The stability and accuracy of the two methods were compared to solve the instability of the standard method and the accuracy of low-content samples.A mixture of sodium carbonate and sodium hydroxide was used as the extraction solution,constant temperature water bath oscillation extraction of soil samples,after cooling,filtration and pH adjustment,they were determined by flame atomic absorption spectrometer(AAS)and inductively coupled plasma emission spectrometer(ICP-OES).The results show that the absorption value of AAS method is small,the sensitivity is low,and the results are unstable,while the sensitivity of ICP-OES method is high,and the interference is small;When the sample size was 5.00g,the detection limit(0.10 mg·kg^(-1))and relative standard deviation(n=7,0.92%~1.22%)of ICP-OES were lower than those of AAS(0.54mg·kg^(-1),2.43%~4.23%);the relative error RE of the experimental results of reference material verification was also lower than that of AAS(3.87)by ICP-OES(0.38%),and the recoveries of hexavalent chromium in actual samples were 96.47%~103.40%(ICP-OES)and 85.56%~117.43%(AAS),respectively.The ICP-OES method has low detection limit,good repeatability,accuracy and recovery,and is more suitable for low-concentration environmental soil monitoring.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.166