碳中和战略下林业碳汇引入生态修复司法之效能探究  

Effectiveness of Forestry Carbon Sinks in Introduction of Ecological Restoration Justice under Carbon Neutral Strategy

作　　者：晋海[1] 刘新虎 JIN Hai;LIU Xinhu(Hohai University,Nanjing 210000,China)

机构地区：[1]河海大学,江苏南京210000

出　　处：《林业调查规划》2023年第3期130-136,共7页Forest Inventory and Planning

基　　金：2020年度江苏省社科基金重点项目(20FXA002).

摘　　要：2022年以来,部分法院接力推动林业碳汇引入生态修复司法的进程,并最终得到司法解释的认可,形成了林业碳汇替代性赔偿方案。林业碳汇交易系实现碳达峰、碳中和的重要路径,生态环境司法也提出要服务碳达峰、碳中和的实现。在此背景下,分析该方案的实践样态,探查林业碳汇引入生态修复司法的现实需求、原有制度的缺陷以及引入基础,揭示林业碳汇替代性赔偿方案的潜在效能,特别是其对碳达峰、碳中和战略的重要意义,从而尝试给出加速林业碳汇法律化进程,明确林业碳汇替代性赔偿方案的属性及实用领域等针对性优化建议。Since 2022,some courts have been promoting the introduction of forestry carbon sinks into the ecological restoration justice process,which has been recognized by judicial interpretation and formed an alternative compensation scheme for forestry carbon sinks.The trading of forestry carbon sinks is an important path to achieve carbon peaking and carbon neutrality,and ecological justice also proposes to serve the achievement of carbon peaking and carbon neutrality.This paper analyzed this scheme in practice,and explored the practical needs,shortcomings and basis for the introduction of forestry carbon sinks into ecological restoration justice,revealed the potential effectiveness of the alternative compensation scheme for forestry carbon sinks,especially its significance to the strategy of carbon peaking and carbon neutrality,so as to give targeted optimization suggestions such as accelerating the process of forestry carbon sinks legalization,and clarifying the attributes and practical fields of alternative compensation scheme.

关 键 词：碳中和战略 林业碳汇 生态修复司法 森林生态服务功能 替代性赔偿方案 

分 类 号：D912.6[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学] P461.7[政治法律—法学] S718.5[天文地球—大气科学及气象学]