检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:程帅 何衡湘[1] 双正文 张小川[1] 蔡雨洋 龙幸[1] 黄鲭萤 CHENG Shuai;HE Hengxiang;SHUANG Zhengwen;ZHANG Xiaochuan;CAI Yuyang;LONG Xing;HUANG Qingying(Southwest Institute of Technical Physics Chengdu,610000,China)
出 处:《电光与控制》2023年第8期84-88,共5页Electronics Optics & Control
摘 要:为得到一套系统化、标准化的激光角度欺骗干扰设备综合评价方法,首先经过对比分析后,采用AHP层次分析法,构建了三层级评价指标体系和各层级指标比较矩阵;其次采用和积法加乘幂法,结合最小二乘法的计算方式,得到各层级指标权重值,其一致性检验结果均小于0.1;最后根据方案择优和实物对比测试两种情况,结合现有激光角度欺骗干扰作战效能评估以及大量外场试验数据拟合结果,分别为各指标建立了评分方法和模型,并辅以应用实例。结果表明,此方法能够更加有效、严谨地对该设备进行综合评价,解决了以往评价过程难以细化和量化的问题。In order to obtain a systematic and standardized comprehensive evaluation method of laser angle deception jamming equipment firstly after comparative analysis the Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP)is used to build a three-level evaluation index system and a comparison matrix of each level index.Secondly the weight values of indexes at all levels are obtained by using sum product and power multiplication as well as the least square method and the consistency test results are less than 0.1.Finally according to the two cases of scheme selection and physical comparison test and in combination with the existing calculation methods for evaluating the operational effectiveness of laser angle deception jamming and the fitting results of a large number of outfield test data a more reasonable scoring method and model are established for each index supplemented by application examples.The results show that this method can comprehensively evaluate the equipment more effectively and rigorously and solve the problem that the previous evaluation process is difficult to refine and quantify.
分 类 号:TJ955[兵器科学与技术—武器系统与运用工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38