知识产权惩罚性赔偿制度的适用性研究  

Research on the Applicability of Intellectual Property Punitive Damages System

作　　者：陈妍 杨志民 CHEN Yan;YANG Zhimin(Department of Law,Jingdezhen Ceramic University,Jingdezhen 333403,Jiangxi,China)

机构地区：[1]景德镇陶瓷大学法学系,江西景德镇333403

出　　处：《科技和产业》2023年第12期63-70,共8页Science Technology and Industry

基　　金：2022年景德镇市社会科学规划项目(202235)。

摘　　要：虽然惩罚性赔偿已经引入知识产权领域,但其适用仍存在诸多困境。究其原因,主要在于:一是关于知识产权惩罚性赔偿的适用基础仍存在争议;二是惩罚性赔偿适用的惩罚功能效果面临扭曲;三是知识产权惩罚性赔偿适用的标准不一。知识产权惩罚性赔偿的适用能够适应知识产权的无形性与政策工具属性,其也有着比较法的支撑。基于知识产权的自身特点,知识产权惩罚性赔偿的适用应坚持谦抑性与赔偿相适应原则。在适用路径上,主观方面应统一表述为故意,计算赔偿基数应严格限缩,客观情节应注重减责情形,赔偿倍数因子量化应对各情节适当合并与分解。Although punitive damages have been introduced into the field of intellectual property,there are still many difficulties in their application.The main reasons for this are:First,the basis of the application of punitive damages for intellectual property rights is still controversial.Second,the effect of the punitive function of the application of punitive damages is facing distortion.Third,the standards of the application of punitive damages for intellectual property rights are different.The application of IPR punitive damages can adapt to the intangibility of IPR and the attributes of policy instruments,and it also has the support of comparative law.Based on the characteristics of intellectual property rights,the application of punitive damages for intellectual property rights should adhere to the principles of modesty and adaptability of compensation.In terms of the application path:the subjective aspect should be unified as intentional,the calculation of the compensation base should be strictly limited,the objective circumstances should focus on the reduction of liability,and the quantification of the compensation multiplier factor should be appropriately combined and decomposed for each circumstance.

关 键 词：知识产权(IPR) 惩罚性赔偿 谦抑性原则 倍数量化 

分 类 号：D923.4[政治法律—民商法学]