低强度行政审查的协同性  

The Coordination of Low-intensity Administrative Examination

作　　者：韩思阳[1] HAN Siyang(Shanghai Normal University,Shanghai 200234,China)

机构地区：[1]上海师范大学法政学院,上海200234

出　　处：《现代法学》2023年第4期32-45,共14页Modern Law Science

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目“行政协议判断标准的体系构造研究”(20BFX054)。

摘　　要：低强度行政审查下得出的有限事实与行政行为“事实清楚”的要求存在某种张力,应解决协同性问题。功能主义视角下,提高效率形成的低强度行政审查产生并主要存在于依申请行政行为领域。低强度行政审查满足了“放管服”改革需求,并回应了由此带来的监管挑战。在规范主义层面,结构性制约决定了低强度行政审查不会消失且与行政登记联系密切。低强度行政审查的协同性有赖于配套的事中、事后监管制度。低强度行政审查作为一种认定法律事实的机制,所得出的有限事实可视为“法律事实清楚”,由此,低强度行政审查与行政法体系的紧张关系可得以消解。低强度行政审查的运行需要司法审查和行政执法责任制的配套改革。There is a conflict between the limited facts obtained under low-intensity administrative examination and the requirement of“clear facts”in administrative actions,and coordination issues should be addressed.From the perspective of functionalism,improving efficiency leads to low-intensity administrative examination,which mainly exists in the field of application based administrative actions.Low-intensity administrative examination has met the needs of“streamlining management and serving”reform and responded to the regulatory challenges brought about by it.At the normative level,structural constraints determine that low-intensity administrative examination will not disappear and is closely related to administrative registration.The coordination of low-intensity administrative examination also comes from the supporting system of in-process and post-supervision.Low-intensity administrative examination can be seen as a mechanism for defining legal facts,and the limited facts obtained can be seen as“clear legal facts”,thus eliminating the tense relationship between low-intensity administrative examination and the administrative law system.The smooth operation of low-intensity administrative examination cannot be separated from the coordinated reform of judicial review and administrative law enforcement responsibility system.

关 键 词：低强度行政审查 协同性 结构性制约 法律事实 

分 类 号：DF31[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]