检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王冉冉 WANG Ranran(Koguan School of Law,Shanghai Jiao Tong University,Shanghai 200030,China)
出 处:《现代法学》2023年第4期46-58,共13页Modern Law Science
基 金:国家哲学社会科学基金重大项目“大数据时代个人数据保护与数据权利体系研究”(18ZDA145)的阶段性研究成果。
摘 要:目前我国法律对已公开的个人信息的合理使用规定不够明确,已公开的个人信息合理使用的内涵与外延都存在被泛化和扩大化解释的趋势,其根本原因在于个人信息的可转让属性尚未厘清。个人信息因与原权益人的关联性而具有受限制的不可转让性,原权益人对已公开的个人信息仍然享有控制权益,已公开个人信息的合理使用范围需进行限缩解释。合理使用的判断标准应由“已公开标准”到“分离性标准”,以“二阶判断”方式确定处理行为对原权益人的利益关联效果,限缩可分离性的使用,可为合理使用边界的诠释提供逻辑基础和规范模式。Currently,Chinese law doesn’t stipulate the reasonable use of disclosed personal information clearly enough.The connotation and extension of the reasonable use of disclosed personal information tend to be generalized and broadened interpreted,with the fundamental reason that the transferable attribute of personal information has not been clarified.Personal information only has limited transferability due to its relatedness with the original rights holder.The original rights holder still has rights and interests of control over the disclosed personal information,and the reasonable use scope of the disclosed personal information should be interpreted in a limited way.The judgment of reasonable use should be converted from the“disclosed criterion”to the“separability criterion”,determining the association effect between the processing behavior and interests of the original rights holder by a“second-order judgment”approach,limiting the use of inseparability,and thus can provide the logical basis and normative mode for the interpretation of reasonable use boundary.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222