检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐真[1,2] Xu Zhen(Civil and Commercial Law Department,Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120,China;Chongging Intellectual Property Tribunal,Chongqing 401120,China)
机构地区:[1]西南政法大学民商法学院,重庆401120 [2]重庆知识产权法庭,重庆401120
出 处:《科技与法律(中英文)》2023年第4期81-89,共9页Science Technology and Law(Chinese-English Version)
基 金:国家社科基金重大项目“创新驱动发展战略下知识产权公共领域问题研究”(17ZDA138)。
摘 要:民事侵权与行政确权程序二元分立体制造成商标民行交叉案件的程序困境,导致实践中案件审理周期长、商标效力认定反复、循环诉讼等问题。商标诉讼民行交叉与涉不动产登记等传统民行交叉及专利诉讼民行交叉存在重要区别,既有的程序衔接模型无法有效纾解前述困境。通过法理分析与比较研究可知,问题的解决须诉诸民行制度壁垒之打破与贯通。司法政策层面,应允许法院在民事侵权程序中对商标有效性进行审查,并注意限缩该规则的适用范围及民事判决的既判力范围。立法层面,可引入商标公众评审制度以从根源上减少问题商标的产生,并对现行确权程序予以针对性优化,最终促进商标民行交叉诉讼实现程序协调、结果公正与效能提升之价值目标。The procedural dilemma brought by the dual separation system of civil infringement and administrative con⁃firmation procedure for trademark civil and commercial cross cases leads to problems such as long trial cycle,repeated determination of trademark effectiveness,circular litigation and so on.There are important differences between trade⁃mark litigation and traditional civil-banking intersection such as real estate registration and patent litigation,and the existing procedural convergence model can not effectively alleviate the above dilemma.Through juris-prudential analy⁃sis and comparative study,we can see that the solution of the problem must resort to the breaking and penetration of the barriers of the civil and administrative system.At the level of judicial policy,the court should be allowed to exam⁃ine the validity of the trademark in the civil infringement procedure,and pay attention to limit the scope of application of the rule and the scope of res adjudicator of civil judgment.At the legislative level,the trademark public review sys⁃tem can be introduced to reduce the emergence of problematic trademarks from the root,and optimize the current pro⁃cedure of confirming rights.Finally,promote the trademark civil and commercial cross-litigation to achieve the value goal of procedure coordination,result justice and efficiency improvement.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222