博弈与重构:学术争辩与马克思主义话语权建构(1919—1949)  

Game and Reconstruction:Academic Debates and the Construction of Marxist Discourse Power

作　　者：王海军 Wang Hai-jun

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学中共党史党建研究院 [2]延安大学

出　　处：《理论与改革》2023年第4期26-38,162,163,共15页Theory and Reform

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目“中国共产党对外话语和叙事体系建构的文献收集整理与研究(1919—1949)”(22&ZD022)。

摘　　要：马克思主义是在斗争中不断向前发展的。在新民主主义革命时期,马克思主义话语权的建构始终伴随着与其他各种社会思潮的话语交锋与话语较量,思想上与各种错误思潮的论战成为马克思主义话语权建构的最重要方式。学术争辩是革命时期话语生成和话语传播的重要途径,体现在无论是马克思主义者还是非马克思主义者、反马克思主义者,都试图通过借助马克思主义话语阐释中国革命理论,分析中国社会发展问题,以争取话语权。该时期是马克思主义话语权由弱变强的重要时期,马克思主义话语权建构过程并非一帆风顺,其同各种社会思潮之间展开了长时间学术争辩。经过长达三十年的争辩,最终确立了马克思主义话语权的优势地位。当前国内学界对该时期学术争辩的研究不够,未将这些争辩放在马克思主义话语权争夺的视角下进行梳理研究。而在该时期争夺马克思主义话语权的争辩此起彼伏,呈现错综复杂的局面。研究其对马克思主义话语权建构的影响,有助于我们更好地认识和总结马克思主义话语权建构的规律。Marxism develops continuously in the struggle.During the New Democratic Revolution,the construction of Marxist discourse power was always been accompanied by the discourse confrontation and discourse contest with other social trends of thought,and the debate with various wrong trends of thought became the most important way.Academic debate was an important part of discourse generation and communication during the revolutionary period,which was reflected in that both Marxists,non Marxists and anti-Marxists tried to use Marxist discourse to explain the theory of Chinese revolution and analyze the problems of Chinese social development to strive for the right of discourse.In this period,the Marxist discourse power made weak-to-strong transition.After thirty years of debate,the Marxist discourse power finally held a dominant position.The current domestic academic failed to sort out and study these arguments from the perspective of struggle over Marxist discourse power.It is helpful for us to better understand and summarize the laws of the construction of Marxist discourse power.

关 键 词：学术争辩 话语权 马克思主义话语权 意识形态主导权 学术话语权 

分 类 号：A124[哲学宗教—马克思主义哲学]