检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李琳[1] 李称鑫 李小萌[3] LI Lin;LI Chenxin;LI Xiaomeng(School of International Studies,University of International Business and Economics,Beijing 100029,China;School of International Studies,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310058,China;School of International Education,University of International Business and Economics,Beijing 100029,China)
机构地区:[1]对外经济贸易大学英语学院,北京100029 [2]浙江大学外国语学院,浙江杭州310058 [3]对外经济贸易大学国际学院,北京100029
出 处:《外国语》2023年第3期57-69,共13页Journal of Foreign Languages
基 金:国家社科基金项目“中国对外经济话语能力提升策略研究”(21BYY087)。
摘 要:探究国外学界对中国经济的整体认知和态度,为我们廓清国际舆论提供理据,为建构中国对外经济话语体系,提升中国对外经济话语传播能力提供参考。本研究以评价系统为基础,提出新的三维评价分析框架,采用主题建模和文本挖掘方法考察国外学界对中国经济的评价。研究发现:1)国外学界主要关注“‘一带一路’倡议”“中国金融改革”“中国经济改革”“中国的全球经济角色”和“中美经济关系”五个经济领域;2)国外学界对各个领域的评价存在显著差异,对“中国经济改革”“中国的全球经济角色”和“‘一带一路’倡议”持偏积极态度,对“中国金融改革”和“中美经济关系”持偏消极态度;3)国外学界评价各个经济领域所使用的态度词汇存在显著差异。This study aims to investigate the overall awareness and attitude of foreign academia towards China’s economy,providing a rationale and reference for clarifying international public opinion,constructing China’s foreign economic discourse system,and improving China’s ability to promote its foreign economic discourse.Based on the Appraisal Theory,a new three-dimensional evaluation analysis framework was proposed,and topic modeling and text mining methods were adopted to investigate the evaluation of China’s economy in foreign academia.The study yielded the following findings:(1)Foreign academia mainly focuses on five economic fields:the Belt and Road Initiative,China’s financial reform,China’s economic reform,China’s role in global economy,and Sino-US economic relations.(2)There are significant differences in the evaluation of these five economic fields by foreign academia.A more positive attitudes were found towards China’s economic reform,China’s role in global economy,and the Belt and Road Initiative,while a little bit negative attitudes were found towards China’s financial reform and Sino-US economic relations.(3)Significant differences were found in the attitude lexica resources used by foreign academia to evaluate these five economic fields.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222