追逃追赃视角下美国引渡实践对我国引渡法的启示——“中国香港引渡美国公民案”评析  

Implications of U.S.Extradition Practice for China's Extradition Law from the Perspective of Pursuing Fugitives and Stolen Goods——A Review of the Extradition of U.S.Citizen from Chinese Hongkong

作　　者：胡城军 黄思嘉 Hu Chengjun;Huang Sijia(Hunan Normal University,Changsha,410006,Hunan)

机构地区：[1]湖南师范大学,湖南长沙410006

出　　处：《湖南警察学院学报》2023年第2期81-93,共13页Journal of Hunan Police Academy

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“构建中国特色境外追逃追赃国际合作法律机制研究”(17ZDA136)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：美国法院格蕾丝·陈引渡案告诉我们,包括商业贿赂的贿赂犯罪是符合双重犯罪原则的可引渡犯罪;美国引渡机制下行政部门与司法部门相互掣肘;由判例产生并发展的不过问规则深刻影响着美国引渡司法审查;在证据方面强调引渡合理根据标准的运用。该案对我国引渡的立法与司法具有启示意义,即在引渡法及双边引渡条约中增设并细化引渡证据标准要求;引渡诉讼中由检察机关代表请求引渡国出庭;法院作出的引渡裁决应增强说理论证。该案也进一步强化了中国香港作为特别行政区在刑事协助方面的独立司法地位,并显示了中国在追逃追赃方面的成效。The extradition case of Grace Chan Seong in the United States Court tells us that bribery crimes including commercial bribery are extraditable crimes in line with the principle of double crime.There are mutual constraints between the executive branch and the judicial branch under the extradition mechanism of the United States.The judicial review of extradition in the United States has been deeply influenced by the rule of indifference which is produced and developed by precedents.Emphasize the application of the"reasonable basis for extradition"standard in terms of evidence.This case also has enlightening significance for the legislation and judiciary of extradition in China,which includes adding and refining the requirements for extradition evidence standards in extradition laws and bilateral extradition treaties;in extradition proceedings,the representative of the procuratorial organ requests the extradition country to appear in court.The extradition ruling made by the court should enhance the reasoning.This case further strengthens the independent judicial status of Hongkong as a special administrative region in criminal assistance,and demonstrates China's effectiveness in pursuing fugitives and recovering stolen goods.

关 键 词：引渡 贿赂犯罪 追逃追赃 合理根据 司法审查 

分 类 号：D997[政治法律—国际法学]