检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:常春 韩桂君 CHANG Chun;HAN Gui-jun(Wuhan UniversityWuhan430072,China;Zhongnan University of Economics and LawWuhan430073,China)
机构地区:[1]武汉大学,武汉430072 [2]中南财经政法大学,武汉430073
出 处:《电子科技大学学报(社科版)》2023年第4期26-33,共8页Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China(Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:国家社会科学基金青年项目(19CFX077)。
摘 要:【目的/意义】以算法管理为核心的平台用工模式,在削弱劳动关系从属性特征的同时,也使平台从业者权益面临风险,亟需规制。【设计/方法】对平台企业的用工管理行为及当前平台经济领域反垄断理论与实践进行分析,论证了反垄断制度用于平台从业者权益保障具有充分可能性。然后,通过比较反垄断法与劳动法价值目标的差异,发现前述路径可能会损及从业者社会权利以及平台企业的正当竞争利益。【结论/发现】将反垄断制度用于平台从业者权益保障时应当分别在从业者、平台企业以及国家或社会三个层面保持一定的限度。[Purpose/Significance]The platform employment model with algorithmic management as the core,while weakening the subordinate characteristics of labor relations,also exposes the rights and interests of platform practitioners to risks,and is in urgent need of regulation.[Design/Methodology]An analysis is conducted on the employment management behavior of platform enterprises and the current antitrust theory and practice in the field of platform economy,demonstrating the full possibility of using antitrust systems to protect the rights and interests of platform practitioners.Then,by comparing the differences in value objectives between Antitrust Law and Labor Law,it is found that the path may harm the social rights of practitioners and the legitimate competitive interests of platform enterprises.[Conclusions/Findings]The antitrust system should be used to respectively protect the rights and interests of platform practitioners at three levels:practitioners,platform enterprises,and the state or society.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229