语言、文学与认同:论台湾地区新文学的“跨语实践”  

Language,Literature and Identity:On the"Cross-language Practice"of Modern Taiwan region Literature

作　　者：马泰祥 MA Tai-xiang(School of Liberal Arts,Southwest University,Chongqing 400715,China)

机构地区：[1]西南大学文学院,重庆400715

出　　处：《厦门大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2023年第4期67-78,共12页Journal of Xiamen University(A Bimonthly for Studies in Arts & Social Sciences)

摘　　要：台湾地区新文学场域中自日据时代到光复初期,文坛主流文学语言发生两次转换,构成事实上的“跨语实践”。语言转换凸显出以“文学汉语”为本位的语言建设路径,及以日语为中心的殖民地台湾地区文坛主流文学通用语地位的塑形与失却;跨语书写展露跨语作家均质共性的集体文化心理,两次“跨语”背后截然不同的转换意义、跨语世代获取主体性的历史经验得以复现;跨语实践中作家采取“方言路线”来学习国语的历史经验,以及直面“日语废止”问题的复杂反应,显示出光复后文化重建的历史必然性与现实挑战性。During Taiwans Japanese colonial era and its subsequent return to Chinese sovereignty,the mainstream literary language used in Taiwans region new literary circles underwent two changes,resulting in a phenomenon known as"crosslanguage practice".This practice demonstrated a language construction path based on"literary Chinese"and the shaping and loss of Japanese as the mainstream literary language.Cross-language writing revealed the collective cultural psychology of cross-language writers,as well as the vastly different transformational meanings behind the two"cross-language"cases.The historical experience of cross-language writers'acquisition of subjectivity could be replicated precisely.Cross-language writers adopted a"dialect approach"to learn Mandarin and proactively confronted the difficulties of"abolishing Japanese",demonstrating the historical inevitability and practical challenges of cultural reconstruction after Taiwan's region return to Chinese sovereignty.

关 键 词：台湾地区文学 跨语实践 文学语言 文化重建 

分 类 号：I206.6[文学—中国文学]