发明构思视角下问题专利产生及其扼制  

The Cause and Suppression of Problem Patent in View of Inventive Concept

作　　者：黄国群[1] 夏媛媛 Huang Guoqun;Xia Yuanyuan(school of Intellectual Property,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200050,China)

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学知识产权学院,上海200050

出　　处：《科技创业月刊》2023年第7期32-37,共6页Journal of Entrepreneurship in Science & Technology

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“全球产业链重构对全球经济治理体系的影响及中国应对研究”(21&ZD074)。

摘　　要：在专利实践中,因专利审查三步法内在局限性及审查员个人原因等多种因素,导致问题专利一直没有得到很好地控制。肇始于美国专利法的发明构思方法在专利审查中有其独特功效,对增加审查客观性有积极作用。为有效控制及扼制问题专利,基于发明构思的方法和视角,申请人应当在申请文件的撰写中体现发明构思,讲好自己的发明故事;审查员在阅读完申请文件后应遵循发明构思原则,对技术方案进行整体性判断,并以此为基点确定现有技术、区别技术特征以及技术效果,以推动创造性判断的客观性,从源头上遏制问题专利的产生。In patent practice,due to the inherent limitations of the three-step patent examination method and examiners’personal reasons,the problem patents have not been well controlled.Originating from American patent law,the method of inventive concept has a unique function in patent examination and plays a positive role in increasing the objectivity of examination.In order to effectively control and curb the problem patent,the applicant shall,based on the method and perspective of the inventive concept,reflect the inventive concept in the application document writing,and properly tell his own invention story;the examiner shall,after reading the application document,follow the principle of inventive concept,make an overall judgment on the technical solution,and determine the prior art,technical features and technical effects on the basis of such judgment,so as to promote the objectivity of the judgment of creativity and curb the occurrence of the problem patent from the source.

关 键 词：发明构思 问题专利 创造性 三步法 

分 类 号：D923.42[政治法律—民商法学]