检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:苏月奂[1] Su Yuehuan(School of Fine Art,Qingdao University,Qingdao Shandong,266071)
出 处:《山东师范大学学报(社会科学版)》2023年第2期138-146,共9页Journal of Shandong Normal University(Social Sciences)
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“感性、德性与法性:三维电影艺术三大元问题研究”(19YJCZH141)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:虚拟现实艺术具有超强的审美沉浸效应,同时携带极高的身心沉迷风险,其机理在学界尚未得到有效阐释,“钵中之脑”实验则提供了可对照情境及身心的分析思路。虚拟现实艺术沉浸与此实验在施动者、媒介、受动者和产物上都可找到对应物,其中唯一一组差异性对应物“虚拟现实艺术接受者身体--营养钵”给出了沉浸中身体存在性悖论的解答--身体为钵。非对应物“手术”致使人成为“钵中之脑”,一方面遗弃和贬低了身体,另一方面指向了意识领域的怀疑主义,引发了虚拟现实艺术沉浸中的意识理性疑虑,警示虚拟现实艺术沉迷风险。“钵中之脑”作为一个假想实验目前还难以在现实中证明和证伪,但虚拟现实艺术沉迷风险已露端倪,立足于现实建立防范体系迫在眉睫。VR art possesses a strong effect of immersion and at the same time carries a high risk of addiction.Its mechanism has not yet been explained academically,but the experiment of“brain in a vat”provides a comparable situation and an analytic train of thought of the body and mind.VR immersion and its experiment can find corresponding parts in the actors,media,subjects and products,but the only one group of differential counterpart is the body of the“VR recipient--the nutrition vat”answers the paradox of body existence in immersion:body is equivalent to the vat.In addiction,the non-counterpart“operation”causes the person to become the brain in the vat,which,on the one hand,abandons and belittles the body,and,on the other,points to skepticism in consciousness,and triggers a warning of the risk of addiction in VR.As a hypothetical experiment,“brain in a vat”is now still difficult to prove and falsify in reality,but the risk of addiction in VR has emerged,and it is urgent to establish a prevention system based on reality.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200