何以称“派”:论新时期之初“七月派”的共建  

Why It is Called a“School”:on the Joint Construction of“Qiyue School”at the Beginning of the New Era

作　　者：宫震 金宏宇[1] Gong Zhen;Jin Hongyu(School of Arts,Wuhan University,Wuhan Hubei,430072)

机构地区：[1]武汉大学文学院,湖北武汉430072

出　　处：《山东师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2023年第2期147-156,共10页Journal of Shandong Normal University(Social Sciences)

摘　　要：“七月派”这一命名不是对历史原貌的寻回或确认,而是在新时期语境中该流派成员和学界共建的结果。一方面,该流派成员通过出版选本、发表回忆文章的方式来建构“七月派”形象。另一方面,学者们对“七月派”的接纳和关注,也使该流派迅速被纳入新的文学史秩序中。这种建构体现了言说主体的某种历史意图:就该流派成员而言,他们强调“七月派”的文学形象,是对20世纪50—70年代政治话语的规避和辩证否定;就学界而言,强调其文学形象又恰好契合了学者们通过“去政治化”来建构新时期文学想象的目的。The name“Qiyue School”is not a search for or confirmation of the original historical appearance,but a result of the joint efforts of members of the school and the academic community in the context of the new era.On the one hand,the scholars constructed the school’s self-expression by publishing anthologies and memory articles.On the other,scholars’acceptance and attention of the“Qiyue School”also made the school quickly incorporated into the new order of literary history.Further exploration will reveal that this construction reflects a certain historical intention of the speakers:as far as the members of this school are concerned,their emphasis on the literary image of the“Qiyue School”is to exclude and evade the political discourse from the 1950s to the 1970s;as far as the academic circles are concerned,the emphasis on the school’s literary image coincides with the purpose of the scholars to deny the old literary system and construct literary imagination in the new era through“depoliticization”.“depoliticization”.

关 键 词：“七月派” “白色花” 文学流派 提纯去杂 胡风 

分 类 号：I209.6[文学—中国文学]