检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:何青苗 杨贤宗 He Qingmiao;Yang Xianzong
机构地区:[1]华中师范大学美术学院 [2]喀什大学美术与设计学院
出 处:《当代美术家》2023年第4期42-46,共5页Contemporary Artists
摘 要:在17世纪下半叶,法国艺术历史学家皮莱在一场关于素描与色彩艺术相对重要性的著名辩论中,毫不掩饰地为以鲁本斯为代表的一派辩护,并为色彩派赢得了最终胜利。在他最后出版的一部著作中,更是将色彩作为重要标准列入他所创造的“画家的天平”艺术评价体系,主张将绘画理论从文学理论中解放出来,并强调绘画对于观众而言所具有的纯粹视觉兴趣问题。早期的艺术鉴赏并不局限于分类或视觉并列等方法论工具,而皮莱大胆地超越了其专业的正常领域,为美术批评建立了评价体系,总结了17世纪的艺术原则并将它视为一个时代的主流品味的结束,是现代艺术批评毫无疑问的先行者。In the second half of the 17th century,the French art historian Pillay unabashedly defended the school of Rubens in a famous debate on the relative importance of drawing and colour art,and won the ultimate victory for the colourists.In one of his last publications,he included colour as an important criterion in his‘painter’s scale’system of art evaluation,arguing for the liberation of painting theory from literary theory and emphasising the purely visual interest of painting for the viewer.While early art appreciation was not limited to methodological tools such as classification or visual juxtaposition,Pillay boldly went beyond the normal realm of his profession to establish a system of evaluation for art criticism,summarising the principles of 17th-century art and seeing it as the end of the dominant taste of an era,the undoubted forerunner of modern art criticism.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.222.197.224